KULDEEP BANJARA vs State — 232/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 483. Disposed: Contested--Dismissed after Full Trial/Hearing on 12th March 2026.

Bail Application

CNR: RJAJ010007672026

Case disposed

Filing Number

528/2026

Filing Date

06-03-2026

Registration No

232/2026

Registration Date

06-03-2026

Court

DJ ADJ Ajmer District HQ

Judge

1-District and Sessions Judge

Decision Date

12th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Dismissed after Full Trial/Hearing

FIR Details

FIR Number

107

Police Station

Clock tower

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 483

Petitioner(s)

KULDEEP BANJARA

Adv. Kailash Chand Sunariwal

Respondent(s)

State

Hearing History

Judge: 1-District and Sessions Judge

12-03-2026

Disposed

10-03-2026

Compliance

07-03-2026

Compliance

Final Orders / Judgements

12-03-2026
Order

Court Decision Summary The Ajmer Session Court rejected the bail applications of Kuldeep Banjara and Kamlesh Banjara under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita. The court found that both accused were involved in a criminal conspiracy to defraud the public by operating illegal betting schemes (B.C.), fraudulently collecting lakhs of rupees, and misappropriating the funds. The court denied bail considering the serious nature of the offenses under Sections 316(2), 318(4), and 61(2) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, the accused's criminal background (15 similar registered cases), and the ongoing threat to public interest. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Court Decision Summary The Ajmer Session Court rejected the bail applications of Kuldeep Banjara and Kamlesh Banjara under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita. The court found that both accused were involved in a criminal conspiracy to defraud the public by operating illegal betting schemes (B.C.), fraudulently collecting lakhs of rupees, and misappropriating the funds. The court denied bail considering the serious nature of the offenses under Sections 316(2), 318(4), and 61(2) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, the accused's criminal background (15 similar registered cases), and the ongoing threat to public interest. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

DJ ADJ Ajmer District HQ All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case