KULDEEP BANJARA vs State — 230/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 483. Disposed: Contested--Dismissed after Full Trial/Hearing on 12th March 2026.

Bail Application

CNR: RJAJ010007652026

Case disposed

Filing Number

526/2026

Filing Date

06-03-2026

Registration No

230/2026

Registration Date

06-03-2026

Court

DJ ADJ Ajmer District HQ

Judge

1-District and Sessions Judge

Decision Date

12th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Dismissed after Full Trial/Hearing

FIR Details

FIR Number

106

Police Station

Clock tower

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 483

Petitioner(s)

KULDEEP BANJARA

Adv. Kailash Chand Sunariwal

Respondent(s)

State

Hearing History

Judge: 1-District and Sessions Judge

12-03-2026

Disposed

10-03-2026

Compliance

07-03-2026

Compliance

Final Orders / Judgements

12-03-2026
Order

Court Decision Summary The Ajmer Sessions Court rejected bail applications of Kuldeep Banjara and Kamlesh Banjara under Section 483 of the CrPC, finding them involved in a serious fraudulent scheme where they allegedly defrauded multiple people of lakhs of rupees by operating illegal BC (Business Correspondent) schemes. The court emphasized that the applicants' substantial criminal history—15 similar cases pending against them—coupled with the grave nature of the conspiracy-based fraud involving public savings, makes them ineligible for bail at this stage of prosecution. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Court Decision Summary The Ajmer Sessions Court rejected bail applications of Kuldeep Banjara and Kamlesh Banjara under Section 483 of the CrPC, finding them involved in a serious fraudulent scheme where they allegedly defrauded multiple people of lakhs of rupees by operating illegal BC (Business Correspondent) schemes. The court emphasized that the applicants' substantial criminal history—15 similar cases pending against them—coupled with the grave nature of the conspiracy-based fraud involving public savings, makes them ineligible for bail at this stage of prosecution. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

DJ ADJ Ajmer District HQ All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case