RAMPRATAP URF RAMU vs State — 220/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 483. Disposed: Contested--Bail Granted on 07th March 2026.

Bail Application

CNR: RJAJ010007542026

Case disposed

Filing Number

516/2026

Filing Date

05-03-2026

Registration No

220/2026

Registration Date

05-03-2026

Court

DJ ADJ Ajmer District HQ

Judge

6-Addl District and Sessions Judge V

Decision Date

07th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Bail Granted

FIR Details

FIR Number

20

Police Station

GRP Ajmer

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 483

Petitioner(s)

RAMPRATAP URF RAMU

Adv. Bhanwar Veerendra Singh

Respondent(s)

State

Hearing History

Judge: 6-Addl District and Sessions Judge V

07-03-2026

Disposed

06-03-2026

Arguments on Applications / Bail Applications / Arguments in Misc. Proceedings

Final Orders / Judgements

07-03-2026
Judgement/Order

Case Summary The Additional Sessions Court, Ajmer granted bail to Rampratap (alias Ramu) under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS). The accused was arrested on 03.02.2026 for possessing a sharp knife under the Arms Act (Section 4/25), recovered during a search at Gandhi Bhavan parking area. The court found no ongoing investigation or recovery pending, and considering the lengthy trial period ahead and his prolonged custody, accepted his bail petition on a bond of ₹30,000 with standard conditions including court appearance and non-tampering with witnesses. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary The Additional Sessions Court, Ajmer granted bail to Rampratap (alias Ramu) under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS). The accused was arrested on 03.02.2026 for possessing a sharp knife under the Arms Act (Section 4/25), recovered during a search at Gandhi Bhavan parking area. The court found no ongoing investigation or recovery pending, and considering the lengthy trial period ahead and his prolonged custody, accepted his bail petition on a bond of ₹30,000 with standard conditions including court appearance and non-tampering with witnesses. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

DJ ADJ Ajmer District HQ All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case