RAMPRATAP URF RAMU vs State — 220/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 483. Disposed: Contested--Bail Granted on 07th March 2026.

Case disposed

Bail Application

CNR: RJAJ010007542026

Filing Number

516/2026

Filing Date

05-Mar-2026

Registration No

220/2026

Registration Date

05-Mar-2026

Court

DJ ADJ Ajmer District HQ

Judge

6-Addl District and Sessions Judge V

Decision Date

07-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Bail Granted

Last updated 02-Apr-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

20

Police Station

GRP Ajmer

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 483

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.RAMPRATAP URF RAMU

    Adv. Bhanwar Veerendra Singh

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.State

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 07-Mar-2026

    Judgement/OrderView PDF

    Case Summary The Additional Sessions Court, Ajmer granted bail to Rampratap (alias Ramu) under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS). The accused was arrested on 03.02.2026 for possessing a sharp knife under the Arms Act (Section 4/25), recovered during a search at Gandhi Bhavan parking area. The court found no ongoing investigation or recovery pending, and considering the lengthy trial period ahead and his prolonged custody, accepted his bail petition on a bond of ₹30,000 with standard conditions including court appearance and non-tampering with witnesses. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 07-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Addl District and Sessions Judge V

  4. 06-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 05-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 220/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary The Additional Sessions Court, Ajmer granted bail to Rampratap (alias Ramu) under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS). The accused was arrested on 03.02.2026 for possessing a sharp knife under the Arms Act (Section 4/25), recovered during a search at Gandhi Bhavan parking area. The court found no ongoing investigation or recovery pending, and considering the lengthy trial period ahead and his prolonged custody, accepted his bail petition on a bond of ₹30,000 with standard conditions including court appearance and non-tampering with witnesses. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case