AJARUDDEN URF AJJU vs State — 217/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 483. Disposed: Contested--Bail Refused on 13th March 2026.
Bail Application
CNR: RJAJ010007212026
Filing Number
503/2026
Filing Date
27-Feb-2026
Registration No
217/2026
Registration Date
27-Feb-2026
Court
DJ ADJ Ajmer District HQ
Judge
3-Addl District and Sessions Judge II
Decision Date
13-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Bail Refused
Last updated 06-Jun-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
312
Police Station
Pushkar
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.AJARUDDEN URF AJJU
Adv. Bhanwar Singh Gaur
Respondent(s)
-
1.State
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
13-Mar-2026
OrderView PDF
-
13-Mar-2026
OrderView PDF
Case 217/2026 Summary: The Additional Sessions Court rejected Ajarudden's bail application under Section 483 BNS. The petitioner was accused of assault and robbery along with co-accused in an incident on October 17-18, 2025, where the victim was attacked with weapons and robbed of jewelry. The court found that the petitioner has three prior criminal cases for arms violations and that the co-accused has 13 prior cases, indicating habitual criminality. The court rejected arguments of innocence and reconciliation, holding that the serious charges (attempted murder, criminal intimidation, wrongful restraint, and assault under BNS) and criminal history warranted continued detention. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
13-Mar-2026
Disposed
Addl District and Sessions Judge II
-
06-Mar-2026
Arguments on Applications / Bail Applications / Arguments in Misc. Proceedings
District and Sessions Judge
-
05-Mar-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
27-Feb-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 217/2026
Case 217/2026 Summary: The Additional Sessions Court rejected Ajarudden's bail application under Section 483 BNS. The petitioner was accused of assault and robbery along with co-accused in an incident on October 17-18, 2025, where the victim was attacked with weapons and robbed of jewelry. The court found that the petitioner has three prior criminal cases for arms violations and that the co-accused has 13 prior cases, indicating habitual criminality. The court rejected arguments of innocence and reconciliation, holding that the serious charges (attempted murder, criminal intimidation, wrongful restraint, and assault under BNS) and criminal history warranted continued detention. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts