GHEESA KHA vs State — 179/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 483. Disposed: Contested--Bail Granted on 09th March 2026.
Bail Application
CNR: RJAJ010006262026
Filing Number
425/2026
Filing Date
24-Feb-2026
Registration No
179/2026
Registration Date
24-Feb-2026
Court
DJ ADJ Ajmer District HQ
Judge
3-Addl District and Sessions Judge II
Decision Date
09-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Bail Granted
Last updated 02-Apr-2026
FIR Details
Police Station
Civil Lines
Year
0
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.GHEESA KHA
Adv. Vinod Makwana
Respondent(s)
-
1.State
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
09-Mar-2026
OrderView PDF
The Additional Sessions Judge, Ajmer, granted bail to Ghisa Khan (accused in FIR 47/2025 for offenses under IPC Sections 420, 465, 467, 471) on the condition that he furnish personal bond of Rs. 1 lakh and two sureties of Rs. 50,000 each. The court found that since the accused had been in custody since 15-12-2025 and the case was triable by Magistrate court with trial duration uncertain, bail was justified without commenting on case merits. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
09-Mar-2026
Disposed
Addl District and Sessions Judge II
-
07-Mar-2026
Arguments on Applications / Bail Applications / Arguments in Misc. Proceedings
Addl District and Sessions Judge II
-
06-Mar-2026
Arguments on Applications / Bail Applications / Arguments in Misc. Proceedings
Addl District and Sessions Judge II
-
05-Mar-2026
Arguments on Applications / Bail Applications / Arguments in Misc. Proceedings
Addl District and Sessions Judge II
-
04-Mar-2026
Arguments on Applications / Bail Applications / Arguments in Misc. Proceedings
District and Sessions Judge
-
25-Feb-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
24-Feb-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 179/2026
The Additional Sessions Judge, Ajmer, granted bail to Ghisa Khan (accused in FIR 47/2025 for offenses under IPC Sections 420, 465, 467, 471) on the condition that he furnish personal bond of Rs. 1 lakh and two sureties of Rs. 50,000 each. The court found that since the accused had been in custody since 15-12-2025 and the case was triable by Magistrate court with trial duration uncertain, bail was justified without commenting on case merits. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts