DEEPAK AGARWAL vs State — 87/2026

Case under Essential Commodities Act Section 6C. Disposed: Contested--Allowed / Granted after Full Trial / Hearing on 23rd March 2026.

Case disposed

Cr. Appeal

CNR: RJAJ010005692026

Filing Number

379/2026

Filing Date

20-Feb-2026

Registration No

87/2026

Registration Date

27-Feb-2026

Court

DJ ADJ Ajmer District HQ

Judge

1-District and Sessions Judge

Decision Date

23-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Allowed / Granted after Full Trial / Hearing

Last updated 06-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Essential Commodities Act Section 6C

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.DEEPAK AGARWAL

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.State

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 23-Mar-2026

    JudgementView PDF

    The Session Court in Ajmer allowed Deepak Agarwal's appeal against the District Collector's order for disposal of seized goods under the Essential Commodities Act, 1955. The court found insufficient evidence that the seized material was biodiesel rather than base oil (as claimed by Agarwal with GST-paid bills from an authorized supplier), and noted the prosecution failed to provide credible forensic proof. The court set aside the confiscation order and directed return of the seized goods upon Agarwal depositing Rs. 28 lakhs as surety/bond. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 23-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    District and Sessions Judge

  4. 13-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 20-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 87/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The Session Court in Ajmer allowed Deepak Agarwal's appeal against the District Collector's order for disposal of seized goods under the Essential Commodities Act, 1955. The court found insufficient evidence that the seized material was biodiesel rather than base oil (as claimed by Agarwal with GST-paid bills from an authorized supplier), and noted the prosecution failed to provide credible forensic proof. The court set aside the confiscation order and directed return of the seized goods upon Agarwal depositing Rs. 28 lakhs as surety/bond. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case