DEEPAK AGARWAL vs State — 87/2026

The Session Court in Ajmer allowed Deepak Agarwal's appeal against the District Collector's order for disposal of seized goods under the Essential Commodities Act, 1955. The court found insufficient evidence that the seized material was biodiesel rather than base oil (as claimed by Agarwal with GST-paid bills from an authorized supplier), and noted the prosecution failed to provide credible forensic proof. The court set aside the confiscation order and directed return of the seized goods upon Agarwal depositing Rs. 28 lakhs as surety/bond. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.