PUSHPA vs TARKESHWARI Advocate - Devendra Kumar Bairwa — 22/2024

Case under Indian Succession Act Section 372. Disposed: Contested--Allowed / Granted after Full Trial / Hearing on 13th March 2026.

Case disposed

Civil Misc. Non connected (38) - CIVIL MISC (NC)

CNR: RJAJ010003902024

Filing Number

116/2024

Filing Date

01-Feb-2024

Registration No

22/2024

Registration Date

07-Feb-2024

Court

DJ ADJ Ajmer District HQ

Judge

1-District and Sessions Judge

Decision Date

13-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Allowed / Granted after Full Trial / Hearing

Last updated 06-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Indian Succession Act Section 372

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.PUSHPA

    Adv. Lalit Kumar Chauhan

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.TARKESHWARI Advocate - Devendra Kumar Bairwa

  2. 2.duresh

    Adv. Devendra Kumar Bairwa

  3. 3.kamlesh rajoriya

    Adv. Pramod Kumar Rana

  4. 4.anju kumari

    Adv. Devendra Kumar Bairwa

  5. 5.jyotsana

    Adv. Pramod Kumar Rana

  6. 6.Manish kumar

    Adv. Devendra Kumar Bairwa

  7. 7.Ram life insurance co.

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 13-Mar-2026

    Judgement/OrderView PDF

    Case Summary: PUSHPA v. TARKESHWARI & Others (Case 22/2024) Court Decision: The District Judge of Ajmer granted Pushpa's petition under Section 372 of the Indian Succession Act, 1925, declaring her as the legal heir of her deceased parents (Virendra Kumar and Sona Devi) and issued a Certificate of Inheritance. The court directed Sri Ram Life Insurance Company to pay Pushpa insurance policy amounts totaling ₹29,57,011/- from five life insurance policies purchased during the deceased's lifetime. Key Reasoning: The court found that Pushpa and five co-heirs (Respondents 1-6) are the sole legal successors of their parents who died on 13.12.2020 and 17.12.2020 respectively. Since the policies had no valid nominee designations and the deceased left no will, the court upheld Pushpa's entitlement as a legal heir to claim the matured insurance proceeds. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 13-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    District and Sessions Judge

  4. 09-Mar-2026

    Final arguments

    District and Sessions Judge

  5. 06-Mar-2026

    Final arguments

    District and Sessions Judge

  6. 05-Mar-2026

    Final arguments

    District and Sessions Judge

  7. 04-Mar-2026

    Final arguments

    District and Sessions Judge

  8. 20-Feb-2026

    Final arguments

    District and Sessions Judge

  9. 10-Feb-2026

    Final arguments

    District and Sessions Judge

  10. 23-Jan-2026

    Final arguments

    District and Sessions Judge

  11. 16-Jan-2026

    Compliance

    District and Sessions Judge

  12. 22-Dec-2025

    Compliance

    District and Sessions Judge

  13. 15-Dec-2025

    Compliance

    District and Sessions Judge

  14. 05-Dec-2025

    Final arguments

    District and Sessions Judge

  15. 03-Dec-2025

    Final arguments

    District and Sessions Judge

  16. 28-Nov-2025

    Plaintiff Evidence

    District and Sessions Judge

  17. 31-Oct-2025

    Plaintiff Evidence

    District and Sessions Judge

  18. 15-Oct-2025

    Plaintiff Evidence

    District and Sessions Judge

  19. 13-Oct-2025

    Plaintiff Evidence

    District and Sessions Judge

  20. 19-Sep-2025

    Plaintiff Evidence

    District and Sessions Judge

  21. 06-Sep-2025

    Plaintiff Evidence

    District and Sessions Judge

  22. 21-Aug-2025

    Plaintiff Evidence

    District and Sessions Judge

  23. 07-Aug-2025

    Plaintiff Evidence

    District and Sessions Judge

  24. 03-Jul-2025

    Plaintiff Evidence

    District and Sessions Judge

  25. 15-May-2025

    Plaintiff Evidence

    District and Sessions Judge

  26. 23-Apr-2025

    Plaintiff Evidence

    District and Sessions Judge

  27. 02-Apr-2025

    Plaintiff Evidence

    District and Sessions Judge

  28. 19-Mar-2025

    Plaintiff Evidence

    District and Sessions Judge

  29. 28-Feb-2025

    Plaintiff Evidence

    District and Sessions Judge

  30. 05-Feb-2025

    Plaintiff Evidence

    District and Sessions Judge

  31. 24-Jan-2025

    Plaintiff Evidence

    District and Sessions Judge

  32. 17-Jan-2025

    Plaintiff Evidence

    District and Sessions Judge

  33. 08-Jan-2025

    Plaintiff Evidence

    District and Sessions Judge

  34. 17-Dec-2024

    Plaintiff Evidence

    District and Sessions Judge

  35. 06-Dec-2024

    Plaintiff Evidence

    District and Sessions Judge

  36. 27-Nov-2024

    Issues

    District and Sessions Judge

  37. 06-Nov-2024

    Issues

    District and Sessions Judge

  38. 30-Sep-2024

    Awaiting Services of notices/ summons

    District and Sessions Judge

  39. 27-Aug-2024

    Awaiting Services of notices/ summons

    District and Sessions Judge

  40. 13-Aug-2024

    Reply of Application/ Steps by parties

    District and Sessions Judge

  41. 06-Aug-2024

    Reply of Application/ Steps by parties

    District and Sessions Judge

  42. 30-Jul-2024

    Reply of Application/ Steps by parties

    District and Sessions Judge

  43. 18-Jul-2024

    Reply of Application/ Steps by parties

    District and Sessions Judge

  44. 23-May-2024

    Reply of Application/ Steps by parties

    District and Sessions Judge

  45. 25-Apr-2024

    Reply of Application/ Steps by parties

    District and Sessions Judge

  46. 27-Mar-2024

    Reply of Application/ Steps by parties

    District and Sessions Judge

  47. 18-Mar-2024

    Awaiting Services of notices/ summons

    District and Sessions Judge

  48. 13-Mar-2024

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  49. 01-Feb-2024

    Case filed

    Registration No. 22/2024

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: PUSHPA v. TARKESHWARI & Others (Case 22/2024) Court Decision: The District Judge of Ajmer granted Pushpa's petition under Section 372 of the Indian Succession Act, 1925, declaring her as the legal heir of her deceased parents (Virendra Kumar and Sona Devi) and issued a Certificate of Inheritance. The court directed Sri Ram Life Insurance Company to pay Pushpa insurance policy amounts totaling ₹29,57,011/- from five life insurance policies purchased during the deceased's lifetime. Key Reasoning: The court found that Pushpa and five co-heirs (Respondents 1-6) are the sole legal successors of their parents who died on 13.12.2020 and 17.12.2020 respectively. Since the policies had no valid nominee designations and the deceased left no will, the court upheld Pushpa's entitlement as a legal heir to claim the matured insurance proceeds. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case