Sushanta Das and another vs Tapan Nayak and others — 242/2026
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 26. Status: Service Return. Next hearing: 29th July 2026.
C.S.(i) - CIVIL SUITS (I)
CNR: ODCU030004532026
Filing Number
447/2026
Filing Date
07-Mar-2026
Registration No
242/2026
Registration Date
07-Mar-2026
Court
Civil Judge Senior Division, Cuttack
Judge
12-CIVIL Judge Senior Division 1St Court
Last updated 16-Jul-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Sushanta Das and another
Adv. Kishore Kumar Sahoo
Respondent(s)
-
1.Tapan Nayak and others
Case History
-
29-Jul-2026
Next hearingPending
-
18-Apr-2026
Service Return
CIVIL Judge Senior Division 1St Court
-
17-Mar-2026
Court OrderView PDF
Case Summary: C.S.(I) No. 242/2026 Main Suit: The suit for declaration and permanent injunction filed by Sushanta Das and another against Tapan Nayak and others was admitted on 17.03.2026. Summons issued to defendants; case adjourned to 18.04.2026 for Statement of Claim & Particulars of Claim. Interim Application (I.A. No. 1/2026): The petitioners' application for ex-parte temporary injunction restraining the defendant from alienating the disputed land was rejected. The court found no urgent circumstances warranting ex-parte relief without hearing the opposite party. Notice issued to defendant for 31.03.2026; interim application under Order 39 Rules 1-2 CPC to be heard after defendant's appearance. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
17-Mar-2026
Service Return
CIVIL Judge Senior Division 1St Court
-
09-Mar-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
07-Mar-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 242/2026
Case Summary: C.S.(I) No. 242/2026 Main Suit: The suit for declaration and permanent injunction filed by Sushanta Das and another against Tapan Nayak and others was admitted on 17.03.2026. Summons issued to defendants; case adjourned to 18.04.2026 for Statement of Claim & Particulars of Claim. Interim Application (I.A. No. 1/2026): The petitioners' application for ex-parte temporary injunction restraining the defendant from alienating the disputed land was rejected. The court found no urgent circumstances warranting ex-parte relief without hearing the opposite party. Notice issued to defendant for 31.03.2026; interim application under Order 39 Rules 1-2 CPC to be heard after defendant's appearance. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts