Nandkishor Bhagwanrao Deshmukh vs State of Maharashtra through Collecter — 146/2023

Case under Specific Relief Act Section 34,38,39. Status: Evidence. Next hearing: 18th June 2026.

Evidence Next hearing 18-Jun-2026 this date has passed

R.C.S. - Regular Civil Suit

CNR: MHYA230024632020

Filing Number

800143/2023

Filing Date

02-May-2018

Registration No

146/2023

Registration Date

02-May-2018

Court

Civil Judge Sr. Dn., Umarkhed

Judge

1-Civil Judge Senior Division Umarkhed

Last updated 25-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Specific Relief Act Section 34,38,39

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Nandkishor Bhagwanrao Deshmukh

    Adv. Tehare V.V.

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.State of Maharashtra through Collecter

  2. 2.Sub Divisional Officer/Special Land Accauisition Officer Umarkhed

  3. 3.Land Acquisition New National Mahamarg No 361 Umarkhed

  4. 4.Motiram Champatrao Shinde

  5. 5.Parmeshwar Champatrao Shinde

  6. 6.Sau. Padminibai Champatrao Shinde

  7. 7.Smt. Laxmibai Champatrao Shinde

  8. 8.Indutai Champatrao Shinde

  9. 9.Prakash Pandurang Shinde

  10. 10.Virendra Pandurang Shinde

  11. 11.Smt. Vimalbai Pandurang Shinde

  12. 12.Sau. Jyoti Anil Jadhao

  13. 13.Sau.Archana Devkumar Kale

Case History

  1. 18-Jun-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 30-Apr-2026

    Evidence

    Civil Judge Senior Division Umarkhed

  3. 09-Apr-2026

    Evidence

    Civil Judge Senior Division Umarkhed

  4. 12-Mar-2026

    Evidence

    Civil Judge Senior Division Umarkhed

  5. 23-Feb-2026

    Evidence

    Civil Judge Senior Division Umarkhed

  6. 22-Dec-2025

    Evidence

    Civil Judge Senior Division Umarkhed

  7. 13-Nov-2025

    Issues

    Civil Judge Senior Division Umarkhed

  8. 30-Oct-2025

    Order on ExhibitView PDF

    The petition (Application No. 40) filed in a property dispute case is allowed and granted with costs. The court rejected the respondents' objections regarding defective notice, missing parties, and procedural defects, finding them devoid of merit, and directed the matter to proceed on its merits. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  9. 30-Oct-2025

    Issues

    Civil Judge Senior Division Umarkhed

  10. 07-Oct-2025

    Order on Exh

    Civil Judge Senior Division Umarkhed

  11. 25-Sep-2025

    Order on Exh

    Civil Judge Senior Division Umarkhed

  12. 29-Aug-2025

    Order on Exh

    Civil Judge Senior Division Umarkhed

  13. 04-Aug-2025

    Hearing

    Civil Judge Senior Division Umarkhed

  14. 23-Jun-2025

    Hearing

    Civil Judge Senior Division Umarkhed

  15. 29-Mar-2025

    Hearing

    Civil Judge Senior Division Umarkhed

  16. 15-Feb-2025

    Hearing

    Civil Judge Senior Division Umarkhed

  17. 10-Jan-2025

    Hearing

    Civil Judge Senior Division Umarkhed

  18. 02-Jan-2025

    Hearing

    Civil Judge Senior Division Umarkhed

  19. 30-Nov-2024

    Hearing

    Civil Judge Senior Division Umarkhed

  20. 22-Nov-2024

    Hearing

    Civil Judge Senior Division Umarkhed

  21. 19-Oct-2024

    Hearing

    Civil Judge Senior Division Umarkhed

  22. 19-Sep-2024

    Hearing

    Civil Judge Senior Division Umarkhed

  23. 31-Jul-2024

    Hearing

    Civil Judge Senior Division Umarkhed

  24. 27-Jun-2024

    Hearing

    Civil Judge Senior Division Umarkhed

  25. 07-May-2024

    Hearing

    Civil Judge Senior Division Umarkhed

  26. 01-Apr-2024

    Hearing

    Civil Judge Senior Division Umarkhed

  27. 01-Mar-2024

    Hearing

    Civil Judge Senior Division Umarkhed

  28. 01-Feb-2024

    Hearing

    Civil Judge Senior Division Umarkhed

  29. 17-Jan-2024

    Hearing

    Civil Judge Senior Division Umarkhed

  30. 11-Dec-2023

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  31. 02-May-2018

    Case filed

    Registration No. 146/2023

casestatus.in Summary

The petition (Application No. 40) filed in a property dispute case is allowed and granted with costs. The court rejected the respondents' objections regarding defective notice, missing parties, and procedural defects, finding them devoid of merit, and directed the matter to proceed on its merits. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case