Kashinath Sakharam Bawane vs State of Maha.Through Collector Yavatmal and — 800067/2013

Case under Land Acquisition Act Section 18. Disposed: Contested--PARTLY ALLOWED on 12th March 2026.

Case disposed

L.A.R. - Land Acquisition Reference

CNR: MHYA230019072020

Filing Number

800067/2013

Filing Date

30-Jul-2013

Registration No

800067/2013

Registration Date

30-Jul-2013

Court

Civil Judge Sr. Dn., Umarkhed

Judge

1-Civil Judge Senior Division Umarkhed

Decision Date

12-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--PARTLY ALLOWED

Last updated 25-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Land Acquisition Act Section 18

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Kashinath Sakharam Bawane

    Adv. Pande V.V.

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.State of Maha.Through Collector Yavatmal and

  2. 2.Executive Engineer

  3. 3.Dy.Collector and Spl.L.A.O.Pusad

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 12-Mar-2026

    Copy of JudgmentView PDF

    The Civil Judge Senior Division, Umarkhed, partly allowed the claimant's land acquisition reference under Section 18 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894. The court found the original compensation of Rs. 1,25,000 per hectare inadequate and enhanced it to Rs. 2,53,125 per hectare based on comparable sale instances and applying a 10% annual appreciation rate. The claimant is also entitled to 30% solatium, 12% per annum interest from notification date, and 9-15% post-possession interest as per statutory provisions. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 12-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Civil Judge Senior Division Umarkhed

  4. 10-Mar-2026

    Arguments

    Civil Judge Senior Division Umarkhed

  5. 24-Feb-2026

    Arguments

    Civil Judge Senior Division Umarkhed

  6. 09-Feb-2026

    Arguments

    Civil Judge Senior Division Umarkhed

  7. 16-Jan-2026

    Arguments

    Civil Judge Senior Division Umarkhed

  8. 12-Dec-2025

    Evidence

    Civil Judge Senior Division Umarkhed

  9. 04-Dec-2025

    Evidence

    Civil Judge Senior Division Umarkhed

  10. 13-Nov-2025

    Evidence

    Civil Judge Senior Division Umarkhed

  11. 16-Oct-2025

    Evidence

    Civil Judge Senior Division Umarkhed

  12. 09-Sep-2025

    Evidence

    Civil Judge Senior Division Umarkhed

  13. 08-Aug-2025

    Evidence

    Civil Judge Senior Division Umarkhed

  14. 04-Jul-2025

    Arguments

    Civil Judge Senior Division Umarkhed

  15. 13-Jun-2025

    Arguments

    Civil Judge Senior Division Umarkhed

  16. 11-Apr-2025

    Arguments

    Civil Judge Senior Division Umarkhed

  17. 28-Feb-2025

    Evidence

    Civil Judge Senior Division Umarkhed

  18. 14-Feb-2025

    Evidence

    Civil Judge Senior Division Umarkhed

  19. 17-Jan-2025

    Evidence

    Civil Judge Senior Division Umarkhed

  20. 20-Dec-2024

    Evidence

    Civil Judge Senior Division Umarkhed

  21. 15-Nov-2024

    Evidence

    Civil Judge Senior Division Umarkhed

  22. 18-Oct-2024

    Evidence

    Civil Judge Senior Division Umarkhed

  23. 27-Sep-2024

    Evidence

    Civil Judge Senior Division Umarkhed

  24. 23-Aug-2024

    Evidence

    Civil Judge Senior Division Umarkhed

  25. 18-Jul-2024

    Evidence

    Civil Judge Senior Division Umarkhed

  26. 19-Jun-2024

    Evidence

    Civil Judge Senior Division Umarkhed

  27. 24-Apr-2024

    Evidence

    Civil Judge Senior Division Umarkhed

  28. 13-Mar-2024

    Evidence

    Civil Judge Senior Division Umarkhed

  29. 12-Feb-2024

    Evidence

    Civil Judge Senior Division Umarkhed

  30. 17-Jan-2024

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  31. 30-Jul-2013

    Case filed

    Registration No. 800067/2013

casestatus.in Summary

The Civil Judge Senior Division, Umarkhed, partly allowed the claimant's land acquisition reference under Section 18 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894. The court found the original compensation of Rs. 1,25,000 per hectare inadequate and enhanced it to Rs. 2,53,125 per hectare based on comparable sale instances and applying a 10% annual appreciation rate. The claimant is also entitled to 30% solatium, 12% per annum interest from notification date, and 9-15% post-possession interest as per statutory provisions. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case