Shri. Samir Nathu Gatade-1 vs Shri. Damodhar Pandurang Gatade-1 Advocate - Khaparde R.P. — 66/2021
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 1. Status: Evidence. Next hearing: 18th June 2026.
R.C.S. - Regular Civil Suit
CNR: MHYA210021962021
Next Hearing
18th June 2026
Filing Number
221/2021
Filing Date
25-11-2021
Registration No
66/2021
Registration Date
25-11-2021
Court
Civil Judge Junior Division Wani
Judge
1-Jt.Civil Judge Jr.Dn. and J.M.F.C., Wani
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Shri. Samir Nathu Gatade-1
Adv. N. P. Gilani
Shri. Amit Nathu Gatade
Adv. N. P. Gilani.
Respondent(s)
Shri. Damodhar Pandurang Gatade-1 Advocate - Khaparde R.P.
Shri. Sumit Damodhar Gatade
Adv. N. P. Gilani
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Jt.Civil Judge Jr.Dn. and J.M.F.C., Wani
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 07-05-2026 | Evidence |
| 23-04-2026 | Evidence |
| 09-04-2026 | Evidence |
| 12-03-2026 | Evidence |
| 26-02-2026 | Evidence |
Interim Orders
Summary The court partially allowed the plaintiffs' application for framing additional issues in this ancestral property dispute. The judge framed one additional issue requiring defendant no. 2 to prove the suit property is his separate property, while rejecting the plaintiffs' other proposed issues as unnecessary. The previously framed issues (Exh.26) were recast to include eight consolidated issues addressing whether the property is ancestral, whether a 2004 sale deed is invalid, and whether plaintiffs are entitled to partition and injunction relief. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Order on Exhibit
Summary The court partially allowed the plaintiffs' application for framing additional issues in this ancestral property dispute. The judge framed one additional issue requiring defendant no. 2 to prove the suit property is his separate property, while rejecting the plaintiffs' other proposed issues as unnecessary. The previously framed issues (Exh.26) were recast to include eight consolidated issues addressing whether the property is ancestral, whether a 2004 sale deed is invalid, and whether plaintiffs are entitled to partition and injunction relief. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts