Sanjay S/o Bhaskar Pandive vs Dinesh D.Shirgirwar Advocate - M.A.Nibrad — 1270/2023
Case under Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 138,142. Status: Defence Evidence. Next hearing: 11th June 2026.
S.C.C. - Summons/Summary Criminal Case
CNR: MHYA210020382023
Next Hearing
11th June 2026
Filing Number
1858/2023
Filing Date
12-09-2023
Registration No
1270/2023
Registration Date
12-09-2023
Court
Civil Judge Junior Division Wani
Judge
13-2nd Joint Civil Judge Jr. Dn. and J.M.F.C., Wani
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Sanjay S/o Bhaskar Pandive
Adv. Katkade D.K.
Respondent(s)
Dinesh D.Shirgirwar Advocate - M.A.Nibrad
Hearing History
Judge: 13-2nd Joint Civil Judge Jr. Dn. and J.M.F.C., Wani
Defence Evidence
Defence Evidence
Defence Evidence
Defence Evidence
Defence Evidence
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 14-05-2026 | Defence Evidence |
| 30-04-2026 | Defence Evidence |
| 09-04-2026 | Defence Evidence |
| 12-03-2026 | Defence Evidence |
| 05-02-2026 | Defence Evidence |
Interim Orders
SUMMARY This is a CrPC Section 313 examination order from Vani First Class Magistrate Court dated 06/11/2025 in Case No. 1270/2023. The accused, Dinesh D. Shrikhande (age 43), was questioned regarding charges involving an alleged cheque bounce case where he received ₹4,00,000 from the complainant as a loan (represented as security for business) in July 2023, which he failed to repay. The accused admitted to issuing a cheque for ₹3,50,000 on 25/07/2023 that subsequently bounced on 27/07/2023 due to insufficient funds, and confirmed receiving a legal notice. The order documents the accused's examination and his responses claiming the transaction was a friendly loan arrangement with the witness. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
SUMMARY This is a CrPC Section 313 examination order from Vani First Class Magistrate Court dated 06/11/2025 in Case No. 1270/2023. The accused, Dinesh D. Shrikhande (age 43), was questioned regarding charges involving an alleged cheque bounce case where he received ₹4,00,000 from the complainant as a loan (represented as security for business) in July 2023, which he failed to repay. The accused admitted to issuing a cheque for ₹3,50,000 on 25/07/2023 that subsequently bounced on 27/07/2023 due to insufficient funds, and confirmed receiving a legal notice. The order documents the accused's examination and his responses claiming the transaction was a friendly loan arrangement with the witness. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts