Sau Shital Sanjay Pal vs Sanjay Vijayrao Pal Advocate - A.P.Tonge — 64/2023
Case under Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act Section 12. Status: Evidence. Next hearing: 16th June 2026.
PWDVA Appln. - Application under Domestic Violence Act
CNR: MHYA210019612023
Next Hearing
16th June 2026
Filing Number
1786/2023
Filing Date
01-09-2023
Registration No
64/2023
Registration Date
01-09-2023
Court
Civil Judge Junior Division Wani
Judge
1-Jt.Civil Judge Jr.Dn. and J.M.F.C., Wani
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Sau Shital Sanjay Pal
Adv. Chaudhary N M
Kumar Sahil Sanjay Pal
Ku. Riya Sanjay Pal
Respondent(s)
Sanjay Vijayrao Pal Advocate - A.P.Tonge
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Jt.Civil Judge Jr.Dn. and J.M.F.C., Wani
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 21-05-2026 | Evidence |
| 21-04-2026 | Evidence |
| 17-03-2026 | Evidence |
| 12-03-2026 | Evidence |
| 10-02-2026 | Evidence |
Interim Orders
Summary The petition under the Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005 (Section 23) was partially allowed. The court directed the respondent (husband) to pay interim maintenance of Rs. 15,000 per month to the petitioner (wife) for her sustenance and basic needs, and Rs. 5,000 per month each to the two child applicants for their education and expenses, effective from August 29, 2023 until final disposal of the case. The court also imposed an interim restraint on the respondent from disposing of jointly-held property. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary The petition under the Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005 (Section 23) was partially allowed. The court directed the respondent (husband) to pay interim maintenance of Rs. 15,000 per month to the petitioner (wife) for her sustenance and basic needs, and Rs. 5,000 per month each to the two child applicants for their education and expenses, effective from August 29, 2023 until final disposal of the case. The court also imposed an interim restraint on the respondent from disposing of jointly-held property. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts