Vinayak Mahadeo Bobde-9 vs None — 90/2022
Case under Bombay Regulation Act,1827 Section 8,2. Status: Evidence. Next hearing: 17th June 2026.
M.J.Cases - Misc. Judicial Cases
CNR: MHYA210018282022
Next Hearing
17th June 2026
Filing Number
171/2022
Filing Date
23-08-2022
Registration No
90/2022
Registration Date
23-08-2022
Court
Civil Judge Junior Division Wani
Judge
13-2nd Joint Civil Judge Jr. Dn. and J.M.F.C., Wani
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Vinayak Mahadeo Bobde-9
Adv. Hussainey N.S.
Respondent(s)
None
Hearing History
Judge: 13-2nd Joint Civil Judge Jr. Dn. and J.M.F.C., Wani
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 08-05-2026 | Evidence |
| 08-04-2026 | Evidence |
| 12-03-2026 | Evidence |
| 28-01-2026 | Evidence |
| 12-01-2026 | Evidence |
Interim Orders
Summary: In MJC No.90/2022, the Joint Civil Judge at Wani adjourned the case on 03.01.2024. Applicants Vinayak Mahadeo Bobade and 9 others sought recognition as heirs of deceased Bulkabai Dattuji Bobade (died 08.01.1997) under the Bombay Regulation Act. Objectors Vitthal Dattuji Bobade and others contested the claim. The court directed the matter be posted for evidence of applicants, granting both parties opportunity to adduce evidence. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary: In MJC No.90/2022, the Joint Civil Judge at Wani adjourned the case on 03.01.2024. Applicants Vinayak Mahadeo Bobade and 9 others sought recognition as heirs of deceased Bulkabai Dattuji Bobade (died 08.01.1997) under the Bombay Regulation Act. Objectors Vitthal Dattuji Bobade and others contested the claim. The court directed the matter be posted for evidence of applicants, granting both parties opportunity to adduce evidence. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts