Smt Sindhu Nanaji Khutemate vs Shrikrushna Bhagwan Khutemate Advocate - Chaudhary N M — 37/2024
Case under Specific Relief Act Section 34. Status: Evidence. Next hearing: 09th June 2026.
R.C.S. - Regular Civil Suit
CNR: MHYA210015522024
Next Hearing
09th June 2026
e-Filing Number
13-07-2024
Filing Number
133/2024
Filing Date
18-07-2024
Registration No
37/2024
Registration Date
18-07-2024
Court
Civil Judge Junior Division Wani
Judge
1-Jt.Civil Judge Jr.Dn. and J.M.F.C., Wani
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Smt Sindhu Nanaji Khutemate
Adv. SIDAM ARVIND TULSHIRAM
Sau Indira Sudhakar Malekar
Adv. SIDAM ARVIND TULSHIRAM
Smt Sunita Vinod Khutemate
Adv. SIDAM ARVIND TULSHIRAM
Harshal Vinod Khutemate
Adv. SIDAM ARVIND TULSHIRAM
Sau Sharda Ishwar Daware
Adv. SIDAM ARVIND TULSHIRAM
Sau Swati Umesh Malekar
Adv. SIDAM ARVIND TULSHIRAM
Respondent(s)
Shrikrushna Bhagwan Khutemate Advocate - Chaudhary N M
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Jt.Civil Judge Jr.Dn. and J.M.F.C., Wani
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 27-04-2026 | Evidence |
| 16-04-2026 | Evidence |
| 12-03-2026 | Evidence |
| 10-02-2026 | Evidence |
| 08-01-2026 | Evidence |
Interim Orders
Court Order Summary Petition Dismissed. The Maharashtra civil court rejected the plaintiff's petition challenging the validity of a death certificate and the transfer of agricultural land (plot 10/1) to the respondent. The court found that the death certificate was properly executed according to the deceased's wishes and that the respondent is the legitimate owner of the disputed property, having received it through valid succession. No costs awarded. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Court Order Summary Petition Dismissed. The Maharashtra civil court rejected the plaintiff's petition challenging the validity of a death certificate and the transfer of agricultural land (plot 10/1) to the respondent. The court found that the death certificate was properly executed according to the deceased's wishes and that the respondent is the legitimate owner of the disputed property, having received it through valid succession. No costs awarded. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts