Ashwini Vishal Dahule vs Vishal Shankarrav Dahule Advocate - S.N.Melawar — 27/2025
Case under Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Rules Section 12,23. Status: Reply/Say. Next hearing: 08th June 2026.
PWDVA Appln. - Application under Domestic Violence Act
CNR: MHYA210011332025
Next Hearing
08th June 2026
e-Filing Number
23-06-2025
Filing Number
971/2025
Filing Date
23-06-2025
Registration No
27/2025
Registration Date
23-06-2025
Court
Civil Judge Junior Division Wani
Judge
13-2nd Joint Civil Judge Jr. Dn. and J.M.F.C., Wani
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Ashwini Vishal Dahule
Adv. Sharif Z.Y.
Respondent(s)
Vishal Shankarrav Dahule Advocate - S.N.Melawar
Rekha Shankarrav Dahule
Shankarrav Tukaram Dahule
Hearing History
Judge: 13-2nd Joint Civil Judge Jr. Dn. and J.M.F.C., Wani
Reply/Say
Reply/Say
Evidence
Evidence
Hearing
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 14-05-2026 | Reply/Say |
| 05-05-2026 | Reply/Say |
| 21-04-2026 | Evidence |
| 31-03-2026 | Evidence |
| 23-03-2026 | Hearing |
Interim Orders
Summary: The court partially allowed the petition filed under the Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005. The petitioner (wife) established prima facie evidence of domestic violence inflicted by the respondent (husband) through physical and mental abuse, including demands for dowry and character assassination. The court ordered the respondent to pay interim maintenance of Rs. 3,000 per month to the petitioner pending final judgment of the main case, and warned of criminal action under the Act if the order is not complied with. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary: The court partially allowed the petition filed under the Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005. The petitioner (wife) established prima facie evidence of domestic violence inflicted by the respondent (husband) through physical and mental abuse, including demands for dowry and character assassination. The court ordered the respondent to pay interim maintenance of Rs. 3,000 per month to the petitioner pending final judgment of the main case, and warned of criminal action under the Act if the order is not complied with. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts