Ashwini Vishal Dahule vs Vishal Shankarrav Dahule Advocate - S.N.Melawar — 27/2025

Case under Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Rules Section 12,23. Status: Reply/Say. Next hearing: 08th June 2026.

PWDVA Appln. - Application under Domestic Violence Act

CNR: MHYA210011332025

Reply/Say

Next Hearing

08th June 2026

e-Filing Number

23-06-2025

Filing Number

971/2025

Filing Date

23-06-2025

Registration No

27/2025

Registration Date

23-06-2025

Court

Civil Judge Junior Division Wani

Judge

13-2nd Joint Civil Judge Jr. Dn. and J.M.F.C., Wani

Acts & Sections

Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Rules Section 12,23

Petitioner(s)

Ashwini Vishal Dahule

Adv. Sharif Z.Y.

Respondent(s)

Vishal Shankarrav Dahule Advocate - S.N.Melawar

Rekha Shankarrav Dahule

Shankarrav Tukaram Dahule

Hearing History

Judge: 13-2nd Joint Civil Judge Jr. Dn. and J.M.F.C., Wani

14-05-2026

Reply/Say

05-05-2026

Reply/Say

21-04-2026

Evidence

31-03-2026

Evidence

23-03-2026

Hearing

Interim Orders

31-03-2026
Order on Exhibit

Summary: The court partially allowed the petition filed under the Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005. The petitioner (wife) established prima facie evidence of domestic violence inflicted by the respondent (husband) through physical and mental abuse, including demands for dowry and character assassination. The court ordered the respondent to pay interim maintenance of Rs. 3,000 per month to the petitioner pending final judgment of the main case, and warned of criminal action under the Act if the order is not complied with. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: The court partially allowed the petition filed under the Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005. The petitioner (wife) established prima facie evidence of domestic violence inflicted by the respondent (husband) through physical and mental abuse, including demands for dowry and character assassination. The court ordered the respondent to pay interim maintenance of Rs. 3,000 per month to the petitioner pending final judgment of the main case, and warned of criminal action under the Act if the order is not complied with. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

Civil Judge Junior Division Wani All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case