Ashitosh Vitthal Turankar vs State Of Maharashtra — 63/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 503. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED / GRANTED AFTER FULL HEARING on 08th June 2026.
Other Misc.Cri.Appln - Other Misc.Criminal Application
CNR: MHYA210007342026
e-Filing Number
07-05-2026
Filing Number
611/2026
Filing Date
08-May-2026
Registration No
63/2026
Registration Date
08-May-2026
Court
Civil Judge Junior Division Wani
Judge
1-Jt.Civil Judge Jr.Dn. and J.m.f.c., Wani
Decision Date
08-Jun-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ALLOWED / GRANTED AFTER FULL HEARING
Last updated 17-Jul-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Ashitosh Vitthal Turankar
Adv. TELTUMBDE VIPLAV VILAS
Respondent(s)
-
1.State Of Maharashtra
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
08-Jun-2026
Order on Exhibit
The court granted Ashitosh Vitthal Turankar's petition for temporary custody of a seized Vivo Y-29 mobile phone held as evidence in a gambling case under Maharashtra Police Act Section 122. The court found that Turankar proved ownership through original bills and documents, and determined the phone was not essential for investigation, making police custody unnecessary given risk of deterioration. The petitioner was granted custody on a Rs. 15,000 bond, with conditions including prohibited misuse, mandatory court appearance when required, and police documentation through photographs and detailed inventory. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
08-Jun-2026
Disposed
Jt.Civil Judge Jr.Dn. and J.m.f.c., Wani
-
06-Jun-2026
Order
Jt.Civil Judge Jr.Dn. and J.m.f.c., Wani
-
03-Jun-2026
Order
Jt.Civil Judge Jr.Dn. and J.m.f.c., Wani
-
29-May-2026
Reply Unready
Jt.Civil Judge Jr.Dn. and J.m.f.c., Wani
-
26-May-2026
Reply Unready
Jt.Civil Judge Jr.Dn. and J.m.f.c., Wani
-
18-May-2026
Awaiting Notice
Jt.Civil Judge Jr.Dn. and J.m.f.c., Wani
-
11-May-2026
Awaiting Notice
Jt.Civil Judge Jr.Dn. and J.m.f.c., Wani
-
08-May-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
08-May-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 63/2026
The court granted Ashitosh Vitthal Turankar's petition for temporary custody of a seized Vivo Y-29 mobile phone held as evidence in a gambling case under Maharashtra Police Act Section 122. The court found that Turankar proved ownership through original bills and documents, and determined the phone was not essential for investigation, making police custody unnecessary given risk of deterioration. The petitioner was granted custody on a Rs. 15,000 bond, with conditions including prohibited misuse, mandatory court appearance when required, and police documentation through photographs and detailed inventory. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts