Sunil Baliram Parshive vs Branch Manager — 9/2026

Case under Indian Succession Act Section 372. Disposed: Uncontested--ALLOWED / GRANTED AFTER FULL HEARING on 25th March 2026.

Civil M.A. - Civil Misc. Application

CNR: MHYA210000552026

Case disposed

e-Filing Number

14-01-2026

Filing Number

12/2026

Filing Date

17-01-2026

Registration No

9/2026

Registration Date

17-01-2026

Court

Civil Judge Junior Division Wani

Judge

1-Jt.Civil Judge Jr.Dn. and J.M.F.C., Wani

Decision Date

25th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--ALLOWED / GRANTED AFTER FULL HEARING

Acts & Sections

Indian Succession Act Section 372

Petitioner(s)

Sunil Baliram Parshive

Adv. WARHATE SHEKHAR PANDURANG

Anil Baliram Parshive

Adv. WARHATE SHEKHAR PANDURANG

Sudhir Baliram Parshive

Adv. WARHATE SHEKHAR PANDURANG

Subhash Baliram Parshive

Adv. WARHATE SHEKHAR PANDURANG

Sunita Raju Borke

Adv. WARHATE SHEKHAR PANDURANG

Dipali Surendra Parshive

Adv. WARHATE SHEKHAR PANDURANG

Sharanya Surendra Parshive

Adv. WARHATE SHEKHAR PANDURANG

Respondent(s)

Branch Manager

Hearing History

Judge: 1-Jt.Civil Judge Jr.Dn. and J.M.F.C., Wani

25-03-2026

Disposed

12-03-2026

Hearing

23-02-2026

Evidence

28-01-2026

Public Notice/Proclamation

19-01-2026

Public Notice/Proclamation

Final Orders / Judgements

25-03-2026
Order on Exhibit

The court granted a Succession Certificate under Section 372 of the Indian Succession Act, 1925, allowing the applicants to claim Rs. 4,51,000 from the deceased Baliram Kashinath Parshive's bank account. The court found that the applicants were the sole legal heirs, supported by submitted death certificates, identity documents, and bank records, with no objections received despite public notice publication. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

The court granted a Succession Certificate under Section 372 of the Indian Succession Act, 1925, allowing the applicants to claim Rs. 4,51,000 from the deceased Baliram Kashinath Parshive's bank account. The court found that the applicants were the sole legal heirs, supported by submitted death certificates, identity documents, and bank records, with no objections received despite public notice publication. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

Civil Judge Junior Division Wani All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case