Raju shalik Atram vs Kashiram Sambha Atram Advocate - Margade C.N. — 49/2022
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 35. Status: Reply/Say. Next hearing: 11th June 2026.
R.C.S. - Regular Civil Suit
CNR: MHYA180017012022
Next Hearing
11th June 2026
Filing Number
149/2022
Filing Date
07-12-2022
Registration No
49/2022
Registration Date
07-12-2022
Court
Civil Judge Junior Division Ghatanji
Judge
1-Civil Judge Jr.Dn. and J.M.F.C., Ghatanji
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Raju shalik Atram
Adv. Rathod M.B.
Pravin Shalik Atram
Adv. Rathod M.B.
Ravindra Shalik Atram
Adv. Rathod M.B.
Sulochana shalik Atram
Adv. Rathod M.B.
Respondent(s)
Kashiram Sambha Atram Advocate - Margade C.N.
Subhadrabai Dadarao Korche
Adv. Margade C.N.
Bhaskar Kawdu Surpam
Shewantibai Manik Atram
Mangesh Manik Atram
Janabai Urpa Parvatabai Hiraman Atram
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Civil Judge Jr.Dn. and J.M.F.C., Ghatanji
Reply/Say
Say / Hearing on Exh____Ready
Order
Order
Order
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 23-04-2026 | Reply/Say |
| 02-04-2026 | Say / Hearing on Exh____Ready |
| 12-03-2026 | Order |
| 16-02-2026 | Order |
| 13-01-2026 | Order |
Interim Orders
Summary: The defendant's application to frame an additional issue of limitation was allowed. The court framed Additional Issue No. 3A: "Whether suit is within limitation?" to be decided at final hearing, as there are conflicting dates regarding the cause of action (mutation entries from 2006 versus the SDO order from 08/09/2022), making it a mixed question of law and facts requiring full adjudication rather than preliminary determination. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary: The defendant's application to frame an additional issue of limitation was allowed. The court framed Additional Issue No. 3A: "Whether suit is within limitation?" to be decided at final hearing, as there are conflicting dates regarding the cause of action (mutation entries from 2006 versus the SDO order from 08/09/2022), making it a mixed question of law and facts requiring full adjudication rather than preliminary determination. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts