State of Maharashtra Through Police Station Ghatanji vs Rahul Ramesh Mogare — 704/2025

Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 109. Disposed: Uncontested--COMMITTED TO SESSIONS COURT on 12th March 2026.

Case disposed

R.C.C. - Regular Criminal Case

CNR: MHYA180016912025

Filing Number

1542/2025

Filing Date

18-Sep-2025

Registration No

704/2025

Registration Date

18-Sep-2025

Court

Civil Judge Junior Division Ghatanji

Judge

1-Civil Judge Jr.Dn. and J.m.f.c., Ghatanji

Decision Date

12-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--COMMITTED TO SESSIONS COURT

Last updated 25-May-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

568

Police Station

P.S.Ghatanji

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 109

Petitioner(s)

1.State of Maharashtra Through Police Station Ghatanji

Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

1.Rahul Ramesh Mogare

Case History

Case disposedDisposed
12-Mar-2026

Order on ExhibitView PDF

The Judicial Magistrate found sufficient grounds to frame charges against Rahul Ramesh Mogare under Section 109 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023, and committed the case to the Court of Sessions at Yavatmal for trial, as this offence is exclusively triable by the Sessions Court. The accused is directed to appear before the Sessions Court on 06/04/2026, and all case records and evidence must be transmitted accordingly. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
12-Mar-2026

Disposed

Civil Judge Jr.Dn. and J.m.f.c., Ghatanji
13-Nov-2025

First hearing

Initial hearing scheduled
18-Sep-2025

Case filed

Registration No. 704/2025

casestatus.in Summary

The Judicial Magistrate found sufficient grounds to frame charges against Rahul Ramesh Mogare under Section 109 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023, and committed the case to the Court of Sessions at Yavatmal for trial, as this offence is exclusively triable by the Sessions Court. The accused is directed to appear before the Sessions Court on 06/04/2026, and all case records and evidence must be transmitted accordingly. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.