Smt Savita Dilip Rathod and other vs Bapurao Harlal Rathod and other Advocate - Chawardol N P — 53/2018
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 5. Status: Hearing. Next hearing: 18th June 2026.
R.C.S. - Regular Civil Suit
CNR: MHYA180015452018
Next Hearing
18th June 2026
Filing Number
103/2018
Filing Date
14-11-2018
Registration No
53/2018
Registration Date
14-11-2018
Court
Civil Judge Junior Division Ghatanji
Judge
1-Civil Judge Jr.Dn. and J.M.F.C., Ghatanji
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Smt Savita Dilip Rathod and other
Adv. Dhatrak G I
Respondent(s)
Bapurao Harlal Rathod and other Advocate - Chawardol N P
Mohan Bapurao Rathod
Adv. Chawardol N P
Wasudeo Bapurao Rathod
Adv. Chawardol N P
Sau- Kanta Gajanan Jadhao
Adv. Chawardol N P
Sau Bebi Tukaram Jadhao
Adv. Chawardol N P
Sau Kavita Narayan Chavhan
Adv. Chawardol N P
Sau Lilabai Bapurao Rathod
Adv. Chawardol N P
Sau. Geetabai Wasudeo Rathod
Adv. Chawardol N P
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Civil Judge Jr.Dn. and J.M.F.C., Ghatanji
Hearing
Hearing
Hearing
Hearing
Hearing
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 30-04-2026 | Hearing |
| 08-04-2026 | Hearing |
| 12-03-2026 | Hearing |
| 25-02-2026 | Hearing |
| 11-02-2026 | Hearing |
Interim Orders
Case Summary In Civil Suit No. 53/2018 (Savita Dilip Rathod v. Baburao Harlal Rathod), the District Court at Ghatkopar allowed the petitioner's appeal under Section 21 of the CPC on 21/06/2023. The court found a genuine dispute between the parties regarding the respondent's liability and death benefits, determining that the case merits full adjudication on merits rather than dismissal at the preliminary stage. Costs were reserved for final determination by the trial court. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary In Civil Suit No. 53/2018 (Savita Dilip Rathod v. Baburao Harlal Rathod), the District Court at Ghatkopar allowed the petitioner's appeal under Section 21 of the CPC on 21/06/2023. The court found a genuine dispute between the parties regarding the respondent's liability and death benefits, determining that the case merits full adjudication on merits rather than dismissal at the preliminary stage. Costs were reserved for final determination by the trial court. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts