Ashok Vasantrao Munginwar vs Vivek Shankarrao Katakmwar Advocate - Dhatrak G I — 17/2022
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 5. Status: Evidence. Next hearing: 18th June 2026.
R.C.S. - Regular Civil Suit
CNR: MHYA180004372022
Next Hearing
18th June 2026
Filing Number
56/2022
Filing Date
04-04-2022
Registration No
17/2022
Registration Date
04-04-2022
Court
Civil Judge Junior Division Ghatanji
Judge
1-Civil Judge Jr.Dn. and J.M.F.C., Ghatanji
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Ashok Vasantrao Munginwar
Adv. V.B.Bhure
Vinod Vasantao Munginwar
Sau- Vaishnawi Vishnukant Chandegawe
Respondent(s)
Vivek Shankarrao Katakmwar Advocate - Dhatrak G I
Jitendra Shankarrao Katakamwar
Adv. Dhatrak G I
Narendra Shankarrao Katakamwar
Adv. Dhatrak G I
Ganesh Shankarrao Katakamwar
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Civil Judge Jr.Dn. and J.M.F.C., Ghatanji
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
Report
Report
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 07-05-2026 | Evidence |
| 09-04-2026 | Evidence |
| 12-03-2026 | Evidence |
| 10-02-2026 | Report |
| 12-01-2026 | Report |
Interim Orders
Court Order Summary Case: R.M.N. 17/2022 | Civil Court, Ghatnji, Yavatmal District Outcome: The petition is allowed. The court appointed a Court Commissioner to conduct joint measurement of the disputed properties (plaintiff's plots 15/1, 15/2 and defendant's plots 16/1-16/4) to determine encroachment claims. The plaintiff shall bear 40% and defendant 60% of the commissioner's fees. Both parties must submit necessary documents and attend the measurement proceedings in presence of the commissioner, who will prepare an authenticated measurement map to assist the court in deciding the boundary dispute expeditiously. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Court Order Summary Case: R.M.N. 17/2022 | Civil Court, Ghatnji, Yavatmal District Outcome: The petition is allowed. The court appointed a Court Commissioner to conduct joint measurement of the disputed properties (plaintiff's plots 15/1, 15/2 and defendant's plots 16/1-16/4) to determine encroachment claims. The plaintiff shall bear 40% and defendant 60% of the commissioner's fees. Both parties must submit necessary documents and attend the measurement proceedings in presence of the commissioner, who will prepare an authenticated measurement map to assist the court in deciding the boundary dispute expeditiously. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts