P.S. Kalamb vs Mukund Gulabrao Fale — 610/2024
Case under Maharashtra Prohibition Act Section 65e. Disposed: Uncontested--U/SEC. 258 OF CR.PC on 12th March 2026.
S.C.C. - Summons/Summary Criminal Case
CNR: MHYA170009122024
Filing Number
809/2024
Filing Date
17-12-2024
Registration No
610/2024
Registration Date
17-12-2024
Court
Civil Judge Junior Division Kalamb
Judge
1-Civil Judge Jr.Dn. and J.M.F.C., Kalamb
Decision Date
12th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--U/SEC. 258 OF CR.PC
FIR Details
FIR Number
376
Police Station
Poliice Station Kalamb
Year
2024
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
P.S. Kalamb
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
Mukund Gulabrao Fale
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Civil Judge Jr.Dn. and J.M.F.C., Kalamb
Disposed
Awaiting Summons
Awaiting Summons
Awaiting Summons
Awaiting Summons
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 12-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 20-02-2026 | Awaiting Summons |
| 09-01-2026 | Awaiting Summons |
| 19-11-2025 | Awaiting Summons |
| 12-09-2025 | Awaiting Summons |
Final Orders / Judgements
The court discharged the accused in a Maharashtra Prohibition Act Section 65(e) case by stopping proceedings under Section 258 of CrPC. The discharge was ordered due to prolonged pendency without progress, failure to secure witness presence despite summons, and non-filing of the Complaint Report, rendering further proceedings futile. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
The court discharged the accused in a Maharashtra Prohibition Act Section 65(e) case by stopping proceedings under Section 258 of CrPC. The discharge was ordered due to prolonged pendency without progress, failure to secure witness presence despite summons, and non-filing of the Complaint Report, rendering further proceedings futile. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts