P.S. Kalamb vs Vinod Gajanan Ghotekar — 431/2024
Case under Maharashtra Prohibition Act Section 65e. Disposed: Uncontested--U/SEC. 258 OF CR.PC on 12th March 2026.
S.C.C. - Summons/Summary Criminal Case
CNR: MHYA170006602024
Filing Number
573/2024
Filing Date
26-09-2024
Registration No
431/2024
Registration Date
26-09-2024
Court
Civil Judge Junior Division Kalamb
Judge
1-Civil Judge Jr.Dn. and J.M.F.C., Kalamb
Decision Date
12th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--U/SEC. 258 OF CR.PC
FIR Details
FIR Number
395
Police Station
Poliice Station Kalamb
Year
2024
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
P.S. Kalamb
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
Vinod Gajanan Ghotekar
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Civil Judge Jr.Dn. and J.M.F.C., Kalamb
Disposed
Awaiting Summons
Awaiting Summons
Awaiting Summons
Awaiting Summons
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 12-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 27-02-2026 | Awaiting Summons |
| 27-01-2026 | Awaiting Summons |
| 24-12-2025 | Awaiting Summons |
| 03-11-2025 | Awaiting Summons |
Final Orders / Judgements
The JMFC Kalamb discharged the accused booked under Section 65(e) of the Maharashtra Prohibition Act and stopped the case under Section 258 Cr.P.C. The court found that due to the police's failure to secure witness presence, prolonged pendency without progress, and non-filing of the Competent Authority report, further proceedings were unjustified. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
The JMFC Kalamb discharged the accused booked under Section 65(e) of the Maharashtra Prohibition Act and stopped the case under Section 258 Cr.P.C. The court found that due to the police's failure to secure witness presence, prolonged pendency without progress, and non-filing of the Competent Authority report, further proceedings were unjustified. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts