P.S.Kalamb vs Mangesh Kisanrao Kudmate Advocate - Telange D.G. — 377/2025

Case under Maharashtra Prohibition Act Section 65(e). Disposed: Contested--ACQUITTED on 14th July 2026.

Case disposed

S.C.C. - Summons/Summary Criminal Case

CNR: MHYA170005532025

Filing Number

478/2025

Filing Date

14-Jul-2025

Registration No

377/2025

Registration Date

14-Jul-2025

Court

Civil Judge Junior Division Kalamb

Judge

1-Civil Judge Jr.Dn. and J.m.f.c., Kalamb

Decision Date

14-Jul-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ACQUITTED

Last updated 17-Jul-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

322

Police Station

Poliice Station Kalamb

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

Maharashtra Prohibition Act Section 65(e)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.P.S.Kalamb

    Adv. R.R. Trivedi

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Mangesh Kisanrao Kudmate Advocate - Telange D.G.

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 14-Jul-2026

    Copy of Judgment

    Case 377/2025 Summary: The court acquitted the accused of charges under the Maharashtra Excise Act for alleged possession of country liquor with intent to sell. Although the prosecution established seizure of 13 liters of liquor from the accused's possession on 08/06/2025 in Dhotra, Kalamb taluka, critical evidence was lacking—no independent witness testimony, no chemical analysis report confirming the substance was liquor, and insufficient documentation of evidence custody and handling. The court found the prosecution failed to prove the charges beyond reasonable doubt despite establishing possession, due to absence of corroborating scientific and witness evidence required under criminal procedure. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 14-Jul-2026

    Disposed

    Civil Judge Jr.Dn. and J.m.f.c., Kalamb

  4. 13-Jul-2026

    Evidence

    Civil Judge Jr.Dn. and J.m.f.c., Kalamb

  5. 09-Jul-2026

    Evidence

    Civil Judge Jr.Dn. and J.m.f.c., Kalamb

  6. 26-May-2026

    Evidence

    Civil Judge Jr.Dn. and J.m.f.c., Kalamb

  7. 16-Apr-2026

    Evidence

    Civil Judge Jr.Dn. and J.m.f.c., Kalamb

  8. 04-Mar-2026

    Evidence

    Civil Judge Jr.Dn. and J.m.f.c., Kalamb

  9. 03-Feb-2026

    Evidence

    Civil Judge Jr.Dn. and J.m.f.c., Kalamb

  10. 03-Jan-2026

    Evidence

    Civil Judge Jr.Dn. and J.m.f.c., Kalamb

  11. 08-Dec-2025

    Evidence

    Civil Judge Jr.Dn. and J.m.f.c., Kalamb

  12. 14-Nov-2025

    Evidence

    Civil Judge Jr.Dn. and J.m.f.c., Kalamb

  13. 09-Oct-2025

    Evidence

    Civil Judge Jr.Dn. and J.m.f.c., Kalamb

  14. 20-Sep-2025

    Evidence

    Civil Judge Jr.Dn. and J.m.f.c., Kalamb

  15. 20-Aug-2025

    Evidence

    Civil Judge Jr.Dn. and J.m.f.c., Kalamb

  16. 22-Jul-2025

    Evidence

    Civil Judge Jr.Dn. and J.m.f.c., Kalamb

  17. 14-Jul-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  18. 14-Jul-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. 377/2025

casestatus.in Summary

Case 377/2025 Summary: The court acquitted the accused of charges under the Maharashtra Excise Act for alleged possession of country liquor with intent to sell. Although the prosecution established seizure of 13 liters of liquor from the accused's possession on 08/06/2025 in Dhotra, Kalamb taluka, critical evidence was lacking—no independent witness testimony, no chemical analysis report confirming the substance was liquor, and insufficient documentation of evidence custody and handling. The court found the prosecution failed to prove the charges beyond reasonable doubt despite establishing possession, due to absence of corroborating scientific and witness evidence required under criminal procedure. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case