Dilesh Santosh Kukulwar vs Maharashtra Government — 22/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 503. Disposed: Uncontested--ALLOWED OTHERWISE on 26th May 2026.

Case disposed

Other Misc.Cri.Appln - Other Misc.Criminal Application

CNR: MHYA170003662026

e-Filing Number

06-05-2026

Filing Number

316/2026

Filing Date

06-May-2026

Registration No

22/2026

Registration Date

06-May-2026

Court

Civil Judge Junior Division Kalamb

Judge

1-Civil Judge Jr.Dn. and J.m.f.c., Kalamb

Decision Date

26-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--ALLOWED OTHERWISE

Last updated 17-Jul-2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 503

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Dilesh Santosh Kukulwar

    Adv. Nilesh Suhas Gonde

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Maharashtra Government

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 26-May-2026

    Order on Exhibit

    Case Summary: O.M.Cr.A. 22/2026 The court allowed Dilesh Santosh Kukulwar's application for interim custody of his seized iPhone 12, finding him to be the registered owner with no other claimants. While the investigating officer and prosecution objected citing misuse risks, the court determined these concerns could be adequately addressed through imposed conditions rather than continued police custody. The iPhone was released on Rs. 70,000 indemnity bond, with conditions requiring the applicant to produce the device when required, refrain from alienation or alteration without court permission, and allowing detailed documentation and photography before release. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 26-May-2026

    Disposed

    Civil Judge Jr.Dn. and J.m.f.c., Kalamb

  4. 18-May-2026

    Reply/Say

    Civil Judge Jr.Dn. and J.m.f.c., Kalamb

  5. 08-May-2026

    Reply/Say

    Civil Judge Jr.Dn. and J.m.f.c., Kalamb

  6. 06-May-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  7. 06-May-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 22/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: O.M.Cr.A. 22/2026 The court allowed Dilesh Santosh Kukulwar's application for interim custody of his seized iPhone 12, finding him to be the registered owner with no other claimants. While the investigating officer and prosecution objected citing misuse risks, the court determined these concerns could be adequately addressed through imposed conditions rather than continued police custody. The iPhone was released on Rs. 70,000 indemnity bond, with conditions requiring the applicant to produce the device when required, refrain from alienation or alteration without court permission, and allowing detailed documentation and photography before release. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case