Police station kalamb vs Sudhakar Pandurang Pise Advocate - Choudhary V.A. — 243/2025
Case under Maharashtra Prohibition Act Section 65e. Disposed: Contested--ACQUITTED on 02nd May 2026.
S.C.C. - Summons/Summary Criminal Case
CNR: MHYA170003612025
Filing Number
309/2025
Filing Date
16-04-2025
Registration No
243/2025
Registration Date
16-04-2025
Court
Civil Judge Junior Division Kalamb
Judge
1-Civil Judge Jr.Dn. and J.M.F.C., Kalamb
Decision Date
02nd May 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ACQUITTED
FIR Details
FIR Number
516
Police Station
Poliice Station Kalamb
Year
2024
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Police station kalamb
Adv. R.R. Trivedi
Respondent(s)
Sudhakar Pandurang Pise Advocate - Choudhary V.A.
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Civil Judge Jr.Dn. and J.M.F.C., Kalamb
Disposed
Evidence
Evidence
Plea / Particulars
Plea / Particulars
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 02-05-2026 | Disposed |
| 12-03-2026 | Evidence |
| 26-02-2026 | Evidence |
| 28-01-2026 | Plea / Particulars |
| 14-01-2026 | Plea / Particulars |
Final Orders / Judgements
Court Decision Summary The First Class Judicial Magistrate acquitted the accused under the Maharashtra Prohibition of Illicit Liquor Act, finding the prosecution's case insufficient. Although 9 liters of illicit liquor was seized from the accused on 10/10/2024, the court held that the seizure panchnama (official record) was not properly substantiated, no independent witnesses testified, and crucial evidence like chemical analysis reports were missing, making the charge of possessing liquor for sale unproven beyond reasonable doubt. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Court Decision Summary The First Class Judicial Magistrate acquitted the accused under the Maharashtra Prohibition of Illicit Liquor Act, finding the prosecution's case insufficient. Although 9 liters of illicit liquor was seized from the accused on 10/10/2024, the court held that the seizure panchnama (official record) was not properly substantiated, no independent witnesses testified, and crucial evidence like chemical analysis reports were missing, making the charge of possessing liquor for sale unproven beyond reasonable doubt. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts