P.S. Kalamb vs Ramkrushna Laxman Vayare — 128/2024
Case under Maharashtra Prohibition Act Section 65(e). Disposed: Uncontested--U/SEC. 258 OF CR.PC on 12th March 2026.
S.C.C. - Summons/Summary Criminal Case
CNR: MHYA170001792024
Filing Number
161/2024
Filing Date
27-02-2024
Registration No
128/2024
Registration Date
27-02-2024
Court
Civil Judge Junior Division Kalamb
Judge
1-Civil Judge Jr.Dn. and J.M.F.C., Kalamb
Decision Date
12th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--U/SEC. 258 OF CR.PC
FIR Details
FIR Number
611
Police Station
Poliice Station Kalamb
Year
2023
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
P.S. Kalamb
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
Ramkrushna Laxman Vayare
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Civil Judge Jr.Dn. and J.M.F.C., Kalamb
Disposed
Awaiting Summons
Awaiting Summons
Awaiting Summons
Awaiting Summons
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 12-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 05-02-2026 | Awaiting Summons |
| 05-01-2026 | Awaiting Summons |
| 15-11-2025 | Awaiting Summons |
| 12-09-2025 | Awaiting Summons |
Final Orders / Judgements
The Judicial Magistrate First Class dismissed a case under Section 65(e) of the Maharashtra Prohibition Act and discharged the accused, citing prolonged pendency without progress, failure to secure witness presence, and non-filing of the Competent Authority report. The case was stopped under Section 258 of the Criminal Procedure Code. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
The Judicial Magistrate First Class dismissed a case under Section 65(e) of the Maharashtra Prohibition Act and discharged the accused, citing prolonged pendency without progress, failure to secure witness presence, and non-filing of the Competent Authority report. The case was stopped under Section 258 of the Criminal Procedure Code. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts