Ratnamala Panjabrao Kathale and other four vs Subhadra Ramrao Kathale and other twenty three Advocate - Cjhaudhary V.A. — 1700006/2015
Case under Code of Civil Procedure. Status: Arguments. Next hearing: 20th June 2026.
R.C.S. - Regular Civil Suit
CNR: MHYA170000332015
Next Hearing
20th June 2026
Filing Number
1700006/2015
Filing Date
16-01-2015
Registration No
1700006/2015
Registration Date
16-01-2015
Court
Civil Judge Junior Division Kalamb
Judge
1-Civil Judge Jr.Dn. and J.M.F.C., Kalamb
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Ratnamala Panjabrao Kathale and other four
Adv. Shri A.S.Bawangude
Devendra Panjab Kanthale
Maya Babanrao Sadafale
Chhaya Ravindra Dhoke
Jaya Sunil Mahure
Respondent(s)
Subhadra Ramrao Kathale and other twenty three Advocate - Cjhaudhary V.A.
Alka Ramrao Kanthale
Shobha Mahadeo Khurekar
Indu Manoharrao Mahure
Shobha Ramcharan Kanthale
Laxmi Jitendra Ghankar
Ratanmala Deepak Dhope
Prakash Namdeo Kanthale(Legal Heir) 8.
Nanibai Prakash Kanthale 8.
Rahul Prakash Kanthale 8.
Chetana Devendra Bihar 8.
Sonali Sachin Sadafale 8.
Monali Rahul Parde
Yogesh Dhanchand Kothari
Lalit Dhanchand Kothari
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Civil Judge Jr.Dn. and J.M.F.C., Kalamb
Arguments
Arguments
Arguments
Arguments
Arguments
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 02-05-2026 | Arguments |
| 06-04-2026 | Arguments |
| 12-03-2026 | Arguments |
| 25-02-2026 | Arguments |
| 18-02-2026 | Arguments |
Interim Orders
Summary: In RCS No.6/2015 (Ratnamala v. Subhadra & others), a partition and separate possession suit with temporary injunction application, the court ordered the case to proceed ex parte against defendants 1-7 and 18-19 for non-appearance despite proper service of summons. Defendant 24, who appeared initially but failed to file her written statement and reply, will also have the suit proceed against her in her absence without her written statement and injunction reply. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary: In RCS No.6/2015 (Ratnamala v. Subhadra & others), a partition and separate possession suit with temporary injunction application, the court ordered the case to proceed ex parte against defendants 1-7 and 18-19 for non-appearance despite proper service of summons. Defendant 24, who appeared initially but failed to file her written statement and reply, will also have the suit proceed against her in her absence without her written statement and injunction reply. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts