Rajesh Digambar Bayas vs MAHARASHTRA State Through Police Inspector Cyber Cell police station Yavatmal and one — 4/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 503. Disposed: Uncontested--ALLOWED OTHERWISE on 18th March 2026.

Case disposed

Other Misc.Cri.Appln - Other Misc.Criminal Application

CNR: MHYA170000242026

e-Filing Number

05-01-2026

Filing Number

22/2026

Filing Date

08-Jan-2026

Registration No

4/2026

Registration Date

08-Jan-2026

Court

Civil Judge Junior Division Kalamb

Judge

1-Civil Judge Jr.Dn. and J.m.f.c., Kalamb

Decision Date

18-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--ALLOWED OTHERWISE

Last updated 25-May-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

24

Police Station

Poliice Station Kalamb

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 503

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Rajesh Digambar Bayas

    Adv. TELANGE DHAMMARATNA GOVINDRAO

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.MAHARASHTRA State Through Police Inspector Cyber Cell police station Yavatmal and one

  2. 2.Thanedar saheb police station Kalamb TQ Kalamb Dist Yavatmal

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 18-Mar-2026

    Order on ExhibitView PDF

    The court allowed the applicant's application under Section 503 of BNNS and ordered the return of Rs. 1,23,180/- that was seized by cyber police after the applicant's mobile was hacked and fraudulent UPI transactions were made. The court found no reason to keep the amount on hold since the investigation was nearing completion and no other party had claimed the funds, requiring the applicant to execute an indemnity bond before receiving the refund. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 18-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Civil Judge Jr.Dn. and J.m.f.c., Kalamb

  4. 17-Mar-2026

    Arguments

    Civil Judge Jr.Dn. and J.m.f.c., Kalamb

  5. 16-Mar-2026

    Arguments

    Civil Judge Jr.Dn. and J.m.f.c., Kalamb

  6. 12-Mar-2026

    Arguments

    Civil Judge Jr.Dn. and J.m.f.c., Kalamb

  7. 10-Mar-2026

    Arguments

    Civil Judge Jr.Dn. and J.m.f.c., Kalamb

  8. 31-Jan-2026

    Reply/Say

    Civil Judge Jr.Dn. and J.m.f.c., Kalamb

  9. 23-Jan-2026

    Reply/Say

    Civil Judge Jr.Dn. and J.m.f.c., Kalamb

  10. 15-Jan-2026

    Reply/Say

    Civil Judge Jr.Dn. and J.m.f.c., Kalamb

  11. 08-Jan-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  12. 08-Jan-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 4/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The court allowed the applicant's application under Section 503 of BNNS and ordered the return of Rs. 1,23,180/- that was seized by cyber police after the applicant's mobile was hacked and fraudulent UPI transactions were made. The court found no reason to keep the amount on hold since the investigation was nearing completion and no other party had claimed the funds, requiring the applicant to execute an indemnity bond before receiving the refund. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case