Police Station, Babhulgaon vs Vinod Marotrao Jivatode Advocate - None — 782/2025

Case under The Cigarettes and Other Tobacco Products (Packaging and Labelling) Rules Section 6(b),24. Disposed: Uncontested--U/SEC. 258 OF CR.PC on 12th March 2026.

Case disposed

S.C.C. - Summons/Summary Criminal Case

CNR: MHYA160011252025

Filing Number

1016/2025

Filing Date

28-Nov-2025

Registration No

782/2025

Registration Date

28-Nov-2025

Court

Civil Judge Junior Division Babulgaon

Judge

1-Civil Judge Jr.Dn. and Judicial Magistrate, First Class, Babhulgaon

Decision Date

12-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--U/SEC. 258 OF CR.PC

Last updated 25-May-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

670

Police Station

P.S.Babhulgaon

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

The Cigarettes and Other Tobacco Products (Packaging and Labelling) Rules Section 6(b),24

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Police Station, Babhulgaon

    Adv. (A.P.P.)

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Vinod Marotrao Jivatode Advocate - None

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 12-Mar-2026

    Order on ExhibitView PDF

    The court discharged the accused Vinod Marotrao Jivtoade and discontinued proceedings under Section 281 of the Bharatiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita (2023). The discharge was ordered because the case had been pending idly for an extended period while awaiting summons, and the accused remained absent, making further proceedings purposeless. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 12-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Civil Judge Jr.Dn. and Judicial Magistrate, First Class, Babhulgaon

  4. 13-Dec-2025

    Awaiting Summons

    Civil Judge Jr.Dn. and Judicial Magistrate, First Class, Babhulgaon

  5. 28-Nov-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  6. 28-Nov-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. 782/2025

casestatus.in Summary

The court discharged the accused Vinod Marotrao Jivtoade and discontinued proceedings under Section 281 of the Bharatiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita (2023). The discharge was ordered because the case had been pending idly for an extended period while awaiting summons, and the accused remained absent, making further proceedings purposeless. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case