The State of Maharashtra vs Sunil Shankarrao Debur — 2400117/2015
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 379. Disposed: Contested--ACQUITTED on 24th March 2026.
R.C.C. - Regular Criminal Case
CNR: MHYA160004242015
Filing Number
2400393/2015
Filing Date
03-10-2015
Registration No
2400117/2015
Registration Date
03-10-2015
Court
Civil Judge Junior Division Babulgaon
Judge
1-Civil Judge Jr.Dn. and Judicial Magistrate, First Class, Babhulgaon
Decision Date
24th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ACQUITTED
FIR Details
FIR Number
86
Police Station
P.S.Babhulgaon
Year
2015
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
The State of Maharashtra
Adv. Gaikwad N.R. (A.P.P.)
Respondent(s)
Sunil Shankarrao Debur
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Civil Judge Jr.Dn. and Judicial Magistrate, First Class, Babhulgaon
Disposed
N.B.W._Ready
N.B.W._Ready
N.B.W._Ready
N.B.W._Ready
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 24-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 12-03-2026 | N.B.W._Ready |
| 12-02-2026 | N.B.W._Ready |
| 14-01-2026 | N.B.W._Ready |
| 03-12-2025 | N.B.W._Ready |
Final Orders / Judgements
Court Summary The First Class Magistrate Court at Babhulgaon acquitted all three accused persons (Sunil Shankarrao Debuhr, Pravin Ramdas Gadeker (deceased), and Namdev Shankar Bharti) of charges under IPC Section 379 read with Section 34 for allegedly stealing ₹2,000 from the complainant's shop on May 20, 2015. The court found that the prosecution failed to establish direct evidence linking the accused to the theft despite circumstantial evidence and recovery of some stolen goods. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Court Summary The First Class Magistrate Court at Babhulgaon acquitted all three accused persons (Sunil Shankarrao Debuhr, Pravin Ramdas Gadeker (deceased), and Namdev Shankar Bharti) of charges under IPC Section 379 read with Section 34 for allegedly stealing ₹2,000 from the complainant's shop on May 20, 2015. The court found that the prosecution failed to establish direct evidence linking the accused to the theft despite circumstantial evidence and recovery of some stolen goods. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts