Police Station, Babhulgaon vs Vikky alias Vikesh Madhukar Bobade Advocate - None — 58/2025

Case under Maharashtra Prohibition Act Section 65e. Disposed: Contested--ACQUITTED on 12th March 2026.

S.C.C. - Summons/Summary Criminal Case

CNR: MHYA160000912025

Case disposed

Filing Number

84/2025

Filing Date

22-01-2025

Registration No

58/2025

Registration Date

22-01-2025

Court

Civil Judge Junior Division Babulgaon

Judge

1-Civil Judge Jr.Dn. and Judicial Magistrate, First Class, Babhulgaon

Decision Date

12th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ACQUITTED

FIR Details

FIR Number

860

Police Station

P.S.Babhulgaon

Year

2024

Acts & Sections

Maharashtra Prohibition Act Section 65e

Petitioner(s)

Police Station, Babhulgaon

Adv. (A.P.P.)

Respondent(s)

Vikky alias Vikesh Madhukar Bobade Advocate - None

Hearing History

Judge: 1-Civil Judge Jr.Dn. and Judicial Magistrate, First Class, Babhulgaon

12-03-2026

Disposed

13-01-2026

Evidence

24-11-2025

Evidence

08-10-2025

Evidence

30-08-2025

Evidence

Final Orders / Judgements

12-03-2026
Copy of Judgment

Summary The court acquitted the accused Vikki (Vikesh Madhukr Bobde) of charges under the Maharashtra Prohibition Act, 1949, Section 65(E) for illegal possession and sale of country liquor, finding that the prosecution failed to prove its case beyond reasonable doubt. The prosecution could not establish the charge conclusively due to insufficient evidence, lack of independent witnesses, and absence of chemical analysis reports, despite seizing 26 liters of allegedly illicit liquor worth ₹2,600 from the accused's residence on December 18, 2024. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The court acquitted the accused Vikki (Vikesh Madhukr Bobde) of charges under the Maharashtra Prohibition Act, 1949, Section 65(E) for illegal possession and sale of country liquor, finding that the prosecution failed to prove its case beyond reasonable doubt. The prosecution could not establish the charge conclusively due to insufficient evidence, lack of independent witnesses, and absence of chemical analysis reports, despite seizing 26 liters of allegedly illicit liquor worth ₹2,600 from the accused's residence on December 18, 2024. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

Civil Judge Junior Division Babulgaon All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case