The State of Maharashtra vs Sunil Shankar Debur Advocate - Kadukar G.V. — 20/2016
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 457,380. Disposed: Contested--ACQUITTED on 24th March 2026.
R.C.C. - Regular Criminal Case
CNR: MHYA160000712016
Filing Number
63/2016
Filing Date
30-01-2016
Registration No
20/2016
Registration Date
30-01-2016
Court
Civil Judge Junior Division Babulgaon
Judge
1-Civil Judge Jr.Dn. and Judicial Magistrate, First Class, Babhulgaon
Decision Date
24th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ACQUITTED
FIR Details
FIR Number
136
Police Station
P.S.Babhulgaon
Year
2015
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
The State of Maharashtra
Adv. Gaikwad N.R. (A.P.P.)
Respondent(s)
Sunil Shankar Debur Advocate - Kadukar G.V.
Namdeo Shankar Bharti
Adv. Hajare D.R.
Pravin Ramdas Gadekar
Adv. Hajare D.R.
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Civil Judge Jr.Dn. and Judicial Magistrate, First Class, Babhulgaon
Disposed
N.B.W._Ready
N.B.W._Ready
N.B.W._Ready
N.B.W._Ready
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 24-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 12-03-2026 | N.B.W._Ready |
| 12-02-2026 | N.B.W._Ready |
| 14-01-2026 | N.B.W._Ready |
| 03-12-2025 | N.B.W._Ready |
Final Orders / Judgements
Summary The court acquitted all three accused (Sunil Shankarrao Depur, Namdev Shankar Bharati, and Pravin Ramdas Gadekar) of charges under IPC sections 457 and 380 with section 34, finding that the prosecution failed to prove the theft case beyond reasonable doubt. The judge noted that while a house break-in and theft of ₹10,000 and valuables occurred on June 18-19, 2015, no direct evidence established the accused's involvement, as no witness actually saw them committing the crime. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary The court acquitted all three accused (Sunil Shankarrao Depur, Namdev Shankar Bharati, and Pravin Ramdas Gadekar) of charges under IPC sections 457 and 380 with section 34, finding that the prosecution failed to prove the theft case beyond reasonable doubt. The judge noted that while a house break-in and theft of ₹10,000 and valuables occurred on June 18-19, 2015, no direct evidence established the accused's involvement, as no witness actually saw them committing the crime. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts