Police Station, Babhulgaon vs Bapurao Maroti Debur Advocate - Satish D Thakare — 31/2025

Case under Maharashtra Prohibition Act Section 65e. Disposed: Contested--ACQUITTED on 12th March 2026.

S.C.C. - Summons/Summary Criminal Case

CNR: MHYA160000362025

Case disposed

Filing Number

35/2025

Filing Date

07-01-2025

Registration No

31/2025

Registration Date

07-01-2025

Court

Civil Judge Junior Division Babulgaon

Judge

1-Civil Judge Jr.Dn. and Judicial Magistrate, First Class, Babhulgaon

Decision Date

12th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ACQUITTED

FIR Details

FIR Number

853

Police Station

P.S.Babhulgaon

Year

2024

Acts & Sections

Maharashtra Prohibition Act Section 65e

Petitioner(s)

Police Station, Babhulgaon

Adv. (A.P.P.)

Respondent(s)

Bapurao Maroti Debur Advocate - Satish D Thakare

Hearing History

Judge: 1-Civil Judge Jr.Dn. and Judicial Magistrate, First Class, Babhulgaon

12-03-2026

Disposed

15-01-2026

Evidence

04-12-2025

Awaiting Summons

28-10-2025

Awaiting Summons

02-09-2025

Awaiting Summons

Final Orders / Judgements

12-03-2026
Copy of Judgment

Summary The court acquitted the accused, Bapurao Maroti Deb, of charges under the Maharashtra Prohibition Act, 1949, Section 65(E) for alleged illegal possession and sale of country liquor. The court found that the prosecution failed to prove its case beyond reasonable doubt, as it presented only one witness and could not establish through independent witnesses or chemical analysis that the seized bottles actually contained illicit liquor. Consequently, the accused was ordered to be discharged under the Indian Code of Criminal Procedure, 2023, Section 278(1). This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The court acquitted the accused, Bapurao Maroti Deb, of charges under the Maharashtra Prohibition Act, 1949, Section 65(E) for alleged illegal possession and sale of country liquor. The court found that the prosecution failed to prove its case beyond reasonable doubt, as it presented only one witness and could not establish through independent witnesses or chemical analysis that the seized bottles actually contained illicit liquor. Consequently, the accused was ordered to be discharged under the Indian Code of Criminal Procedure, 2023, Section 278(1). This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

Civil Judge Junior Division Babulgaon All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case