Police Station, Babhulgaon vs Bapurao Maroti Debur Advocate - Satish D Thakare — 31/2025
Case under Maharashtra Prohibition Act Section 65e. Disposed: Contested--ACQUITTED on 12th March 2026.
S.C.C. - Summons/Summary Criminal Case
CNR: MHYA160000362025
Filing Number
35/2025
Filing Date
07-01-2025
Registration No
31/2025
Registration Date
07-01-2025
Court
Civil Judge Junior Division Babulgaon
Judge
1-Civil Judge Jr.Dn. and Judicial Magistrate, First Class, Babhulgaon
Decision Date
12th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ACQUITTED
FIR Details
FIR Number
853
Police Station
P.S.Babhulgaon
Year
2024
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Police Station, Babhulgaon
Adv. (A.P.P.)
Respondent(s)
Bapurao Maroti Debur Advocate - Satish D Thakare
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Civil Judge Jr.Dn. and Judicial Magistrate, First Class, Babhulgaon
Disposed
Evidence
Awaiting Summons
Awaiting Summons
Awaiting Summons
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 12-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 15-01-2026 | Evidence |
| 04-12-2025 | Awaiting Summons |
| 28-10-2025 | Awaiting Summons |
| 02-09-2025 | Awaiting Summons |
Final Orders / Judgements
Summary The court acquitted the accused, Bapurao Maroti Deb, of charges under the Maharashtra Prohibition Act, 1949, Section 65(E) for alleged illegal possession and sale of country liquor. The court found that the prosecution failed to prove its case beyond reasonable doubt, as it presented only one witness and could not establish through independent witnesses or chemical analysis that the seized bottles actually contained illicit liquor. Consequently, the accused was ordered to be discharged under the Indian Code of Criminal Procedure, 2023, Section 278(1). This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary The court acquitted the accused, Bapurao Maroti Deb, of charges under the Maharashtra Prohibition Act, 1949, Section 65(E) for alleged illegal possession and sale of country liquor. The court found that the prosecution failed to prove its case beyond reasonable doubt, as it presented only one witness and could not establish through independent witnesses or chemical analysis that the seized bottles actually contained illicit liquor. Consequently, the accused was ordered to be discharged under the Indian Code of Criminal Procedure, 2023, Section 278(1). This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts