Sheikh Saeem Sheikh Munaf vs Abdul Naeem Sheikh Munaf — 117/2023
Case under Bombay Regulation Act,1827 Section 2/8. Disposed: Uncontested--DISMISSED on 17th March 2026.
Civil M.A. - Civil Misc. Application
CNR: MHYA150013922023
Filing Number
176/2023
Filing Date
09-10-2023
Registration No
117/2023
Registration Date
09-10-2023
Court
Civil Judge Junior Division Ner
Judge
1-Civil Judge, Jr.Dn. and J.M.F.C., Ner
Decision Date
17th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--DISMISSED
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Sheikh Saeem Sheikh Munaf
Adv. Mirza Latif Rafiq
Sheikh Sharukh Sheikh Munaf
Farhana Parveen Sheikh Sadik
Respondent(s)
Abdul Naeem Sheikh Munaf
Rizwana Parveen Anis Khan
Shakila Bi Sheikh Munaf
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Civil Judge, Jr.Dn. and J.M.F.C., Ner
Disposed
Dismissal Order
Compliance
Compliance
Compliance
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 17-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 12-03-2026 | Dismissal Order |
| 12-02-2026 | Compliance |
| 11-12-2025 | Compliance |
| 04-10-2025 | Compliance |
Final Orders / Judgements
The civil application filed by Shaikh Saim and others under sections 2 and 8 of the Bombay Regulation Act was dismissed in default for want of prosecution. The court dismissed the case after the applicants repeatedly failed to appear despite multiple adjournments on 14.08.2025, 04.10.2025, and 12.03.2026, demonstrating lack of interest in proceeding with the matter. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
The civil application filed by Shaikh Saim and others under sections 2 and 8 of the Bombay Regulation Act was dismissed in default for want of prosecution. The court dismissed the case after the applicants repeatedly failed to appear despite multiple adjournments on 14.08.2025, 04.10.2025, and 12.03.2026, demonstrating lack of interest in proceeding with the matter. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts