Sau. Alka Ravindra Deshmukh vs Ravindra Someshwar Deshmukh — 79/2017
Case under Code of Criminal Procedure Section 125(3). Disposed: Uncontested--PROCEEDING STOPPED on 12th March 2026.
Other Misc.Cri.Appln - Other Misc.Criminal Application
CNR: MHYA150005952017
Filing Number
554/2017
Filing Date
20-06-2017
Registration No
79/2017
Registration Date
20-06-2017
Court
Civil Judge Junior Division Ner
Judge
1-Civil Judge, Jr.Dn. and J.M.F.C., Ner
Decision Date
12th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--PROCEEDING STOPPED
FIR Details
Police Station
P.S.Ner
Year
0
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Sau. Alka Ravindra Deshmukh
Adv. Chaudhary V G
Prajwal Ravindra Deshmukh
Adv. Chaudhary V G
Aditi ravindra Deshmukh
Adv. Chaudhary V G
Respondent(s)
Ravindra Someshwar Deshmukh
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Civil Judge, Jr.Dn. and J.M.F.C., Ner
Disposed
Awaiting Warrant
Awaiting Warrant
Awaiting Warrant
Awaiting Warrant
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 12-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 23-01-2026 | Awaiting Warrant |
| 08-12-2025 | Awaiting Warrant |
| 31-10-2025 | Awaiting Warrant |
| 25-09-2025 | Awaiting Warrant |
Final Orders / Judgements
The Judicial Magistrate First Class of Ner, Yavatmal dismissed the miscellaneous criminal application (O.M.C.A. No.79/2017) filed by Alka and others against Ravindra by stopping the proceedings under Section 279 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023. The court found that the applicants had been absent for a prolonged period, taken no steps to advance the matter, and appeared to have lost interest in pursuing it, making the case unfit for continuation under the special drive to dispose of defunct petty matters. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
The Judicial Magistrate First Class of Ner, Yavatmal dismissed the miscellaneous criminal application (O.M.C.A. No.79/2017) filed by Alka and others against Ravindra by stopping the proceedings under Section 279 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023. The court found that the applicants had been absent for a prolonged period, taken no steps to advance the matter, and appeared to have lost interest in pursuing it, making the case unfit for continuation under the special drive to dispose of defunct petty matters. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts