Gopal Dhulichandji Agrawal vs Sandip Indarchandji Gugliya Advocate - Mirza Latif Rafiq — 1900013/2015
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section order39,Rule1,2. Disposed: Uncontested--COMPROMISE DURING OR AFTER EVIDENCE on 12th March 2026.
R.C.S. - Regular Civil Suit
CNR: MHYA150004322015
Filing Number
1900020/2015
Filing Date
08-06-2015
Registration No
1900013/2015
Registration Date
08-06-2015
Court
Civil Judge Junior Division Ner
Judge
1-Civil Judge, Jr.Dn. and J.M.F.C., Ner
Decision Date
12th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--COMPROMISE DURING OR AFTER EVIDENCE
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Gopal Dhulichandji Agrawal
Adv. Chaudhary B. G.
Respondent(s)
Sandip Indarchandji Gugliya Advocate - Mirza Latif Rafiq
Adesh Idarchandaji Gugliya
Adv. Mirza Latif Rafiq
Rashmi Sandip Gugliya
Adv. Mirza Latif Rafiq
Priti Rajesh Gugliya
Adv. Mirza Latif Rafiq
C.E.O.
Adv. Nahale P.S.
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Civil Judge, Jr.Dn. and J.M.F.C., Ner
Disposed
Evidence Part Heard
Evidence Part Heard
Evidence Part Heard
Evidence Part Heard
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 12-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 24-02-2026 | Evidence Part Heard |
| 23-02-2026 | Evidence Part Heard |
| 05-02-2026 | Evidence Part Heard |
| 20-01-2026 | Evidence Part Heard |
Final Orders / Judgements
The court approved a compromise settlement between the plaintiff Gopal and defendants 1-4, finding the terms lawful and acceptable after verifying the parties' identities and examining them on the deed's contents. The suit for declaration and injunctions was disposed of as compromised, with the compromise deed incorporated into the decree and court fees refunded to the plaintiff. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Interim Orders
The court approved a compromise settlement between the plaintiff Gopal and defendants 1-4, finding the terms lawful and acceptable after verifying the parties' identities and examining them on the deed's contents. The suit for declaration and injunctions was disposed of as compromised, with the compromise deed incorporated into the decree and court fees refunded to the plaintiff. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts