Bhanudas Dhanraj Rathod and 1 vs Karan Shankar Rathod and — 3/2025

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section Section9. Disposed: Uncontested--DECREED EX-PARTE on 18th April 2026.

Case disposed

R.C.S. - Regular Civil Suit

CNR: MHYA150001512025

e-Filing Number

12-02-2025

Filing Number

38/2025

Filing Date

14-Feb-2025

Registration No

3/2025

Registration Date

14-Feb-2025

Court

Civil Judge Junior Division Ner

Judge

1-Civil Judge, Jr.Dn. and J.m.f.c., Ner

Decision Date

18-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--DECREED EX-PARTE

Last updated 25-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure Section Section9

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Bhanudas Dhanraj Rathod and 1

    Adv. Chaudhary B. G.

  2. 2.Sushma Bhanudas Rathod

    Adv. Adv Baba Chaudhari

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Karan Shankar Rathod and

  2. 2.Vishal Shankar Rathod

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 18-Apr-2026

    Copy of JudgmentView PDF

    Summary The court decided that the plaintiffs have successfully proven their ownership and possession of the disputed agricultural land (Plot No. 221, measuring 3 hectares 3 ares) and that the defendants unlawfully encroached upon 0.20 hectares of this property on its southern boundary. The judgment directs the defendants to remove the encroachment and restore possession of the encroached area to the plaintiffs within two months, with the court ordering a separate inquiry into profits earned by defendants from the encroached land during the encroachment period. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 18-Apr-2026

    Disposed

    Civil Judge, Jr.Dn. and J.m.f.c., Ner

  4. 17-Apr-2026

    Arguments

    Civil Judge, Jr.Dn. and J.m.f.c., Ner

  5. 07-Apr-2026

    Arguments

    Civil Judge, Jr.Dn. and J.m.f.c., Ner

  6. 30-Mar-2026

    Arguments

    Civil Judge, Jr.Dn. and J.m.f.c., Ner

  7. 25-Mar-2026

    Arguments

    Civil Judge, Jr.Dn. and J.m.f.c., Ner

  8. 12-Mar-2026

    Arguments

    Civil Judge, Jr.Dn. and J.m.f.c., Ner

  9. 31-Jan-2026

    Evidence

    Civil Judge, Jr.Dn. and J.m.f.c., Ner

  10. 20-Jan-2026

    Evidence

    Civil Judge, Jr.Dn. and J.m.f.c., Ner

  11. 22-Dec-2025

    Evidence

    Civil Judge, Jr.Dn. and J.m.f.c., Ner

  12. 03-Dec-2025

    Awaiting Summons

    Civil Judge, Jr.Dn. and J.m.f.c., Ner

  13. 29-Oct-2025

    Awaiting Summons

    Civil Judge, Jr.Dn. and J.m.f.c., Ner

  14. 24-Sep-2025

    Awaiting Summons

    Civil Judge, Jr.Dn. and J.m.f.c., Ner

  15. 19-Aug-2025

    Awaiting Summons

    Civil Judge, Jr.Dn. and J.m.f.c., Ner

  16. 30-Jul-2025

    Evidence Part Heard

    Civil Judge, Jr.Dn. and J.m.f.c., Ner

  17. 24-Jun-2025

    Evidence

    Civil Judge, Jr.Dn. and J.m.f.c., Ner

  18. 24-Apr-2025

    Appearance

    Civil Judge, Jr.Dn. and J.m.f.c., Ner

  19. 19-Mar-2025

    Awaiting Summons

    Civil Judge, Jr.Dn. and J.m.f.c., Ner

  20. 14-Feb-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  21. 14-Feb-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. 3/2025

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The court decided that the plaintiffs have successfully proven their ownership and possession of the disputed agricultural land (Plot No. 221, measuring 3 hectares 3 ares) and that the defendants unlawfully encroached upon 0.20 hectares of this property on its southern boundary. The judgment directs the defendants to remove the encroachment and restore possession of the encroached area to the plaintiffs within two months, with the court ordering a separate inquiry into profits earned by defendants from the encroached land during the encroachment period. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case