Bhanudas Dhanraj Rathod and 1 vs Karan Shankar Rathod and — 3/2025

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section Section9. Disposed: Uncontested--DECREED EX-PARTE on 18th April 2026.

R.C.S. - Regular Civil Suit

CNR: MHYA150001512025

Case disposed

e-Filing Number

12-02-2025

Filing Number

38/2025

Filing Date

14-02-2025

Registration No

3/2025

Registration Date

14-02-2025

Court

Civil Judge Junior Division Ner

Judge

1-Civil Judge, Jr.Dn. and J.M.F.C., Ner

Decision Date

18th April 2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--DECREED EX-PARTE

Acts & Sections

CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE Section Section9

Petitioner(s)

Bhanudas Dhanraj Rathod and 1

Adv. Chaudhary B. G.

Sushma Bhanudas Rathod

Adv. Adv Baba Chaudhari

Respondent(s)

Karan Shankar Rathod and

Vishal Shankar Rathod

Hearing History

Judge: 1-Civil Judge, Jr.Dn. and J.M.F.C., Ner

18-04-2026

Disposed

17-04-2026

Arguments

07-04-2026

Arguments

30-03-2026

Arguments

25-03-2026

Arguments

Final Orders / Judgements

18-04-2026
Copy of Judgment

Summary The court decided that the plaintiffs have successfully proven their ownership and possession of the disputed agricultural land (Plot No. 221, measuring 3 hectares 3 ares) and that the defendants unlawfully encroached upon 0.20 hectares of this property on its southern boundary. The judgment directs the defendants to remove the encroachment and restore possession of the encroached area to the plaintiffs within two months, with the court ordering a separate inquiry into profits earned by defendants from the encroached land during the encroachment period. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The court decided that the plaintiffs have successfully proven their ownership and possession of the disputed agricultural land (Plot No. 221, measuring 3 hectares 3 ares) and that the defendants unlawfully encroached upon 0.20 hectares of this property on its southern boundary. The judgment directs the defendants to remove the encroachment and restore possession of the encroached area to the plaintiffs within two months, with the court ordering a separate inquiry into profits earned by defendants from the encroached land during the encroachment period. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

Civil Judge Junior Division Ner All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case