Sanghamitra Shaligram Mane vs Pawan Prakash Kisanlal Jailswal Advocate - Chaudhary B. G. — 5/2021
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 00. Status: Evidence. Next hearing: 12th June 2026.
R.C.S. - Regular Civil Suit
CNR: MHYA150000872021
Filing Number
20/2021
Filing Date
30-Jan-2021
Registration No
5/2021
Registration Date
30-Jan-2021
Court
Civil Judge Junior Division Ner
Judge
1-Civil Judge, Jr.Dn. and J.m.f.c., Ner
Last updated 25-May-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Sanghamitra Shaligram Mane
Adv. D. G. Deshmukh
Respondent(s)
-
1.Pawan Prakash Kisanlal Jailswal Advocate - Chaudhary B. G.
-
2.Rajesh Nayan Jaiswal
Adv. Chaudhary B. G.
Case History
-
12-Jun-2026
Next hearingPending
-
22-Apr-2026
Evidence
Civil Judge, Jr.Dn. and J.m.f.c., Ner
-
08-Apr-2026
Evidence
Civil Judge, Jr.Dn. and J.m.f.c., Ner
-
30-Mar-2026
Evidence
Civil Judge, Jr.Dn. and J.m.f.c., Ner
-
12-Mar-2026
Evidence
Civil Judge, Jr.Dn. and J.m.f.c., Ner
-
18-Feb-2026
Awaiting Notice
Civil Judge, Jr.Dn. and J.m.f.c., Ner
-
06-Feb-2026
Steps
Civil Judge, Jr.Dn. and J.m.f.c., Ner
-
12-Jan-2026
Awaiting Notice
Civil Judge, Jr.Dn. and J.m.f.c., Ner
-
12-Dec-2025
Awaiting Notice
Civil Judge, Jr.Dn. and J.m.f.c., Ner
-
20-Nov-2025
Evidence
Civil Judge, Jr.Dn. and J.m.f.c., Ner
-
12-Nov-2025
Evidence
Civil Judge, Jr.Dn. and J.m.f.c., Ner
-
15-Oct-2025
Evidence
Civil Judge, Jr.Dn. and J.m.f.c., Ner
-
01-Oct-2025
Evidence
Civil Judge, Jr.Dn. and J.m.f.c., Ner
-
29-Sep-2025
Evidence Part Heard
Civil Judge, Jr.Dn. and J.m.f.c., Ner
-
15-Sep-2025
Evidence Part Heard
Civil Judge, Jr.Dn. and J.m.f.c., Ner
-
25-Aug-2025
Order on ExhibitView PDF
Summary: The defendants' application to discard the plaintiff's evidence under Order 18 Rule 3-A of the Code of Civil Procedure was rejected. The court held that the plaintiff has the right to testify as a witness even after her power of attorney holder has already given evidence, as certain facts and matters are exclusively within the plaintiff's personal knowledge and cannot be deposed by the attorney holder. The court found it necessary to examine the plaintiff to decide the possession suit on merit. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
25-Aug-2025
Evidence Part Heard
Civil Judge, Jr.Dn. and J.m.f.c., Ner
-
14-Aug-2025
Evidence Part Heard
Civil Judge, Jr.Dn. and J.m.f.c., Ner
-
05-Aug-2025
Evidence
Civil Judge, Jr.Dn. and J.m.f.c., Ner
-
29-Jul-2025
Evidence Part Heard
Civil Judge, Jr.Dn. and J.m.f.c., Ner
-
17-Jul-2025
Evidence
Civil Judge, Jr.Dn. and J.m.f.c., Ner
-
30-Jun-2025
Amended Plaint
Civil Judge, Jr.Dn. and J.m.f.c., Ner
-
16-Jun-2025
Order on ExhibitView PDF
-
16-Jun-2025
Argument on Exh.____Ready
Civil Judge, Jr.Dn. and J.m.f.c., Ner
-
05-Apr-2025
Argument on Exh.____Ready
Civil Judge, Jr.Dn. and J.m.f.c., Ner
-
17-Mar-2025
Argument on Exh.____Ready
Civil Judge, Jr.Dn. and J.m.f.c., Ner
-
27-Feb-2025
Argument on Exh.____Ready
Civil Judge, Jr.Dn. and J.m.f.c., Ner
-
05-Feb-2025
Argument on Exh.____Ready
Civil Judge, Jr.Dn. and J.m.f.c., Ner
-
03-Jan-2025
Argument on Exh.____Ready
Civil Judge, Jr.Dn. and J.m.f.c., Ner
-
10-Dec-2024
Argument on Exh.____Ready
Civil Judge, Jr.Dn. and J.m.f.c., Ner
-
22-Nov-2024
Argument on Exh.____Ready
Civil Judge, Jr.Dn. and J.m.f.c., Ner
-
15-Oct-2024
Argument on Exh.____Ready
Civil Judge, Jr.Dn. and J.m.f.c., Ner
-
03-Sep-2024
Argument on Exh.____Ready
Civil Judge, Jr.Dn. and J.m.f.c., Ner
-
07-Aug-2024
Argument on Exh.____Ready
Civil Judge, Jr.Dn. and J.m.f.c., Ner
-
16-Jul-2024
Argument on Exh.____Ready
Civil Judge, Jr.Dn. and J.m.f.c., Ner
-
15-Jun-2024
Argument on Exh.____Ready
Civil Judge, Jr.Dn. and J.m.f.c., Ner
-
04-May-2024
Argument on Exh.____Ready
Civil Judge, Jr.Dn. and J.m.f.c., Ner
-
27-Mar-2024
Argument on Exh.____Ready
Civil Judge, Jr.Dn. and J.m.f.c., Ner
-
11-Mar-2024
Argument on Exh.____Ready
Civil Judge, Jr.Dn. and J.m.f.c., Ner
-
06-Feb-2024
Argument on Exh.____Ready
Civil Judge, Jr.Dn. and J.m.f.c., Ner
-
20-Jan-2024
Argument on Exh.____Ready
Civil Judge, Jr.Dn. and J.m.f.c., Ner
-
18-Dec-2023
Filing of Say on Exh___Ready
Civil Judge, Jr.Dn. and J.m.f.c., Ner
-
20-Nov-2023
Filing of Say on Exh___Ready
Civil Judge, Jr.Dn. and J.m.f.c., Ner
-
21-Oct-2023
Filing of Say on Exh___Ready
Civil Judge, Jr.Dn. and J.m.f.c., Ner
-
26-Sep-2023
Filing of Say on Exh___Ready
Civil Judge, Jr.Dn. and J.m.f.c., Ner
-
24-Jul-2023
Evidence
Civil Judge, Jr.Dn. and J.m.f.c., Ner
-
20-Jun-2023
Evidence
Civil Judge, Jr.Dn. and J.m.f.c., Ner
-
29-Mar-2023
Say / Hearing on Exh____Ready
Civil Judge, Jr.Dn. and J.m.f.c., Ner
-
22-Feb-2023
Say / Hearing on Exh____Ready
Civil Judge, Jr.Dn. and J.m.f.c., Ner
-
12-Jan-2023
Evidence
Civil Judge, Jr.Dn. and J.m.f.c., Ner
-
08-Dec-2022
Evidence
Jt.Civil Judge Jr.Dn. and J.m.f.c., Ner
-
19-Nov-2022
Evidence
Jt.Civil Judge Jr.Dn. and J.m.f.c., Ner
-
06-Oct-2022
Evidence
Jt.Civil Judge Jr.Dn. and J.m.f.c., Ner
-
26-Sep-2022
Evidence
Jt.Civil Judge Jr.Dn. and J.m.f.c., Ner
-
29-Jul-2022
Evidence
Jt.Civil Judge Jr.Dn. and J.m.f.c., Ner
-
06-Jul-2022
Evidence
Jt.Civil Judge Jr.Dn. and J.m.f.c., Ner
-
18-Jun-2022
Written Statement
Jt.Civil Judge Jr.Dn. and J.m.f.c., Ner
-
21-Apr-2022
Issues
Civil Judge, Jr.Dn. and J.m.f.c., Ner
-
08-Mar-2022
Issues
Civil Judge, Jr.Dn. and J.m.f.c., Ner
-
06-Jan-2022
Issues
Civil Judge, Jr.Dn. and J.m.f.c., Ner
-
12-Nov-2021
Issues
Civil Judge, Jr.Dn. and J.m.f.c., Ner
-
27-Sep-2021
Issues
Civil Judge, Jr.Dn. and J.m.f.c., Ner
-
02-Aug-2021
Issues
Civil Judge, Jr.Dn. and J.m.f.c., Ner
-
02-Jul-2021
Written Statement
Civil Judge, Jr.Dn. and J.m.f.c., Ner
-
09-Jun-2021
Written Statement
Civil Judge, Jr.Dn. and J.m.f.c., Ner
-
24-Mar-2021
Written Statement
Civil Judge, Jr.Dn. and J.m.f.c., Ner
-
10-Mar-2021
Awaiting Summons
Civil Judge, Jr.Dn. and J.m.f.c., Ner
-
30-Jan-2021
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
30-Jan-2021
Case filed
Registration No. 5/2021
Summary: The defendants' application to discard the plaintiff's evidence under Order 18 Rule 3-A of the Code of Civil Procedure was rejected. The court held that the plaintiff has the right to testify as a witness even after her power of attorney holder has already given evidence, as certain facts and matters are exclusively within the plaintiff's personal knowledge and cannot be deposed by the attorney holder. The court found it necessary to examine the plaintiff to decide the possession suit on merit. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts