State of Maharashtra vs Smt. Anusaya Sanjay Pawar Advocate - Sawant S.R. — 662/2023

Case under Maharashtra Prohibition Act Section 65 F. Disposed: Contested--ACQUITTED on 26th May 2026.

Case disposed

S.C.C. - Summons/Summary Criminal Case

CNR: MHYA140013542023

Filing Number

1144/2023

Filing Date

24-Nov-2023

Registration No

662/2023

Registration Date

24-Nov-2023

Court

Civil Court Junior Division,Arni

Judge

1-Civil Judge Jr.Dn.and J.m.f.c., Arni

Decision Date

26-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ACQUITTED

Last updated 16-Jul-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

642

Police Station

Arni

Year

2023

Acts & Sections

Maharashtra Prohibition Act Section 65 F

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.State of Maharashtra

    Adv. Gawande Ravindra Prakash

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Smt. Anusaya Sanjay Pawar Advocate - Sawant S.R.

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 26-May-2026

    Copy of Judgment

    Case Summary: State of Maharashtra v. Smt. Anusaya Sanjay Pawar (Case 662/2023) The court acquitted the accused Anusaya Sanjay Pawar of charges under the Mumbai Prohibition Act, Section 65(f), finding that the prosecution failed to prove the allegations beyond reasonable doubt. The critical evidence—including the FIR, seizure panchnama, chemical laboratory report, and testimony of the investigating officer—was not adequately produced or substantiated during trial. The court held that since key witnesses remained absent and essential documentary evidence was not established on record, the charge of illegally possessing 50 liters of liquor valued at ₹5,000 could not be proven. The accused was accordingly acquitted under CrPC Section 255(1) and ordered released. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 26-May-2026

    Disposed

    Civil Judge Jr.Dn.and J.m.f.c., Arni

  4. 04-May-2026

    Arguments

    Civil Judge Jr.Dn.and J.m.f.c., Arni

  5. 30-Mar-2026

    Evidence Part Heard

    Civil Judge Jr.Dn.and J.m.f.c., Arni

  6. 20-Feb-2026

    Evidence

    Civil Judge Jr.Dn.and J.m.f.c., Arni

  7. 06-Jan-2026

    Evidence

    Civil Judge Jr.Dn.and J.m.f.c., Arni

  8. 27-Nov-2025

    Evidence

    Civil Judge Jr.Dn.and J.m.f.c., Arni

  9. 03-Oct-2025

    Evidence

    Civil Judge Jr.Dn.and J.m.f.c., Arni

  10. 21-Aug-2025

    Evidence

    Civil Judge Jr.Dn.and J.m.f.c., Arni

  11. 25-Jun-2025

    Evidence

    Civil Judge Jr.Dn.and J.m.f.c., Arni

  12. 02-May-2025

    Evidence

    Civil Judge Jr.Dn.and J.m.f.c., Arni

  13. 12-Mar-2025

    Evidence

    Civil Judge Jr.Dn.and J.m.f.c., Arni

  14. 15-Jan-2025

    Evidence

    Civil Judge Jr.Dn.and J.m.f.c., Arni

  15. 15-Nov-2024

    Evidence

    Civil Judge Jr.Dn.and J.m.f.c., Arni

  16. 23-Aug-2024

    Evidence

    Civil Judge Jr.Dn.and J.m.f.c., Arni

  17. 05-Jul-2024

    Evidence

    Civil Judge Jr.Dn.and J.m.f.c., Arni

  18. 19-Apr-2024

    Evidence

    Civil Judge Jr.Dn.and J.m.f.c., Arni

  19. 13-Mar-2024

    Evidence

    Civil Judge Jr.Dn.and J.m.f.c., Arni

  20. 06-Feb-2024

    Filing of Surety

    Civil Judge Jr.Dn.and J.m.f.c., Arni

  21. 24-Nov-2023

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  22. 24-Nov-2023

    Case filed

    Registration No. 662/2023

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: State of Maharashtra v. Smt. Anusaya Sanjay Pawar (Case 662/2023) The court acquitted the accused Anusaya Sanjay Pawar of charges under the Mumbai Prohibition Act, Section 65(f), finding that the prosecution failed to prove the allegations beyond reasonable doubt. The critical evidence—including the FIR, seizure panchnama, chemical laboratory report, and testimony of the investigating officer—was not adequately produced or substantiated during trial. The court held that since key witnesses remained absent and essential documentary evidence was not established on record, the charge of illegally possessing 50 liters of liquor valued at ₹5,000 could not be proven. The accused was accordingly acquitted under CrPC Section 255(1) and ordered released. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case