State of Maharashtra vs Shyam Dulsingh Ade — 751/2025

Case under Maharashtra Prohibition Act Section 65(c)65(d). Disposed: Uncontested--U/SEC. 258 OF CR.PC on 12th March 2026.

Case disposed

S.C.C. - Summons/Summary Criminal Case

CNR: MHYA140011292025

Filing Number

975/2025

Filing Date

11-Jul-2025

Registration No

751/2025

Registration Date

11-Jul-2025

Court

Civil Court Junior Division,Arni

Judge

2-Joint Civil Judge Jr.Dn. and J.m.f.c., Arni

Decision Date

12-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--U/SEC. 258 OF CR.PC

Last updated 25-May-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

412

Police Station

Arni

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

Maharashtra Prohibition Act Section 65(c)65(d)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.State of Maharashtra

    Adv. A.P.P.

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Shyam Dulsingh Ade

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 12-Mar-2026

    Order on ExhibitView PDF

    The court closed proceedings against accused Sham Dulung Aade under CrPC Section 258 (Bharatiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita Section 281) due to the prosecution's failure to produce a witness despite adequate opportunities, and acquitted him of charges under the Maharashtra Prohibition Act 1949, Section 65(a,d). This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 12-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Joint Civil Judge Jr.Dn. and J.m.f.c., Arni

  4. 21-Jan-2026

    Plea / Particulars

    Joint Civil Judge Jr.Dn. and J.m.f.c., Arni

  5. 01-Dec-2025

    Plea / Particulars

    Joint Civil Judge Jr.Dn. and J.m.f.c., Arni

  6. 08-Oct-2025

    N.B.W._Unready

    Joint Civil Judge Jr.Dn. and J.m.f.c., Arni

  7. 04-Sep-2025

    N.B.W._Unready

    Joint Civil Judge Jr.Dn. and J.m.f.c., Arni

  8. 11-Jul-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  9. 11-Jul-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. 751/2025

casestatus.in Summary

The court closed proceedings against accused Sham Dulung Aade under CrPC Section 258 (Bharatiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita Section 281) due to the prosecution's failure to produce a witness despite adequate opportunities, and acquitted him of charges under the Maharashtra Prohibition Act 1949, Section 65(a,d). This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case