Pramila Pralhad Sable vs Dr Satish Vasantrao Chiddarwar — 72/2024

Case under Specific Relief (Amendment) Act Section 9. Status: Argument on Exh.____Unready. Next hearing: 29th July 2026.

Argument on Exh.____Unready Next hearing 29-Jul-2026 this date has passed

R.C.S. - Regular Civil Suit

CNR: MHYA130007142024

e-Filing Number

11-06-2024

Filing Number

117/2024

Filing Date

11-Jun-2024

Registration No

72/2024

Registration Date

11-Jun-2024

Court

Civil Judge Junior Division Digras

Judge

2-Jt.Civil Judge Jr.Dn. and J.m.f.c., Digras

Last updated 17-Jul-2026

Acts & Sections

Specific Relief (Amendment) Act Section 9

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Pramila Pralhad Sable

    Adv. R.D.Deshpande

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Dr Satish Vasantrao Chiddarwar

  2. 2.Sunil Adnaynsing Sable

Case History

  1. 29-Jul-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 13-Jul-2026

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    Jt.Civil Judge Jr.Dn. and J.m.f.c., Digras

  3. 29-Jun-2026

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    Jt.Civil Judge Jr.Dn. and J.m.f.c., Digras

  4. 22-Jun-2026

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    Jt.Civil Judge Jr.Dn. and J.m.f.c., Digras

  5. 10-Jun-2026

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    Jt.Civil Judge Jr.Dn. and J.m.f.c., Digras

  6. 26-May-2026

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    Jt.Civil Judge Jr.Dn. and J.m.f.c., Digras

  7. 18-May-2026

    Order on Exhibit

    Case Summary: R.C.S. 72/2024 - Pramila vs Dr. Satish Vasantrao Chiddarwar The court rejected an application by Sk. Jamil Sk. Hamid seeking to be added as an intervenor under Order I Rule VIII-A of the Code of Civil Procedure in the underlying suit involving disputed agricultural property. The court found that the applicant was not a necessary party to the suit for permanent injunction and could present his evidence as a witness during the main trial or defendant's counter-claim proceedings without requiring formal intervenor status. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  8. 18-May-2026

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    Jt.Civil Judge Jr.Dn. and J.m.f.c., Digras

  9. 11-May-2026

    Order on Exh

    Jt.Civil Judge Jr.Dn. and J.m.f.c., Digras

  10. 07-May-2026

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    Jt.Civil Judge Jr.Dn. and J.m.f.c., Digras

  11. 22-Apr-2026

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    Jt.Civil Judge Jr.Dn. and J.m.f.c., Digras

  12. 15-Apr-2026

    Hearing

    Jt.Civil Judge Jr.Dn. and J.m.f.c., Digras

  13. 11-Mar-2026

    Order on Exhibit

  14. 11-Mar-2026

    Hearing

    Jt.Civil Judge Jr.Dn. and J.m.f.c., Digras

  15. 18-Feb-2026

    Hearing

    Jt.Civil Judge Jr.Dn. and J.m.f.c., Digras

  16. 14-Jan-2026

    Hearing

    Jt.Civil Judge Jr.Dn. and J.m.f.c., Digras

  17. 03-Dec-2025

    Hearing

    Jt.Civil Judge Jr.Dn. and J.m.f.c., Digras

  18. 05-Nov-2025

    Hearing

    Jt.Civil Judge Jr.Dn. and J.m.f.c., Digras

  19. 07-Oct-2025

    Hearing

    Jt.Civil Judge Jr.Dn. and J.m.f.c., Digras

  20. 24-Sep-2025

    Hearing

    Jt.Civil Judge Jr.Dn. and J.m.f.c., Digras

  21. 16-Sep-2025

    Hearing

    Jt.Civil Judge Jr.Dn. and J.m.f.c., Digras

  22. 19-Aug-2025

    Hearing

    Jt.Civil Judge Jr.Dn. and J.m.f.c., Digras

  23. 01-Aug-2025

    Hearing

    Jt.Civil Judge Jr.Dn. and J.m.f.c., Digras

  24. 04-Jul-2025

    Hearing

    Jt.Civil Judge Jr.Dn. and J.m.f.c., Digras

  25. 16-Jun-2025

    Hearing

    Jt.Civil Judge Jr.Dn. and J.m.f.c., Digras

  26. 23-Apr-2025

    Hearing

    Jt.Civil Judge Jr.Dn. and J.m.f.c., Digras

  27. 16-Apr-2025

    Hearing

    Jt.Civil Judge Jr.Dn. and J.m.f.c., Digras

  28. 02-Apr-2025

    Hearing

    Jt.Civil Judge Jr.Dn. and J.m.f.c., Digras

  29. 15-Mar-2025

    Hearing

    Jt.Civil Judge Jr.Dn. and J.m.f.c., Digras

  30. 15-Feb-2025

    Written Statement

    Jt.Civil Judge Jr.Dn. and J.m.f.c., Digras

  31. 01-Feb-2025

    Written Statement

    Jt.Civil Judge Jr.Dn. and J.m.f.c., Digras

  32. 18-Jan-2025

    Written Statement

    Jt.Civil Judge Jr.Dn. and J.m.f.c., Digras

  33. 08-Jan-2025

    Written Statement

    Jt.Civil Judge Jr.Dn. and J.m.f.c., Digras

  34. 07-Dec-2024

    Written Statement

    Jt.Civil Judge Jr.Dn. and J.m.f.c., Digras

  35. 06-Nov-2024

    Written Statement

    Jt.Civil Judge Jr.Dn. and J.m.f.c., Digras

  36. 05-Oct-2024

    Written Statement

    Jt.Civil Judge Jr.Dn. and J.m.f.c., Digras

  37. 09-Sep-2024

    Written Statement

    Jt.Civil Judge Jr.Dn. and J.m.f.c., Digras

  38. 21-Aug-2024

    Awaiting Summons

    Jt.Civil Judge Jr.Dn. and J.m.f.c., Digras

  39. 05-Aug-2024

    Awaiting Summons

    Jt.Civil Judge Jr.Dn. and J.m.f.c., Digras

  40. 15-Jul-2024

    Awaiting Summons

    Jt.Civil Judge Jr.Dn. and J.m.f.c., Digras

  41. 15-Jun-2024

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  42. 11-Jun-2024

    Case filed

    Registration No. 72/2024

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: R.C.S. 72/2024 - Pramila vs Dr. Satish Vasantrao Chiddarwar The court rejected an application by Sk. Jamil Sk. Hamid seeking to be added as an intervenor under Order I Rule VIII-A of the Code of Civil Procedure in the underlying suit involving disputed agricultural property. The court found that the applicant was not a necessary party to the suit for permanent injunction and could present his evidence as a witness during the main trial or defendant's counter-claim proceedings without requiring formal intervenor status. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case