Ishwar Shankar Rathod vs Lata Babusing Pawar — 59/2026
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section Order39. Status: W.S. and Say. Next hearing: 13th August 2026.
R.C.S. - Regular Civil Suit
CNR: MHYA130006112026
e-Filing Number
22-05-2026
Filing Number
103/2026
Filing Date
25-May-2026
Registration No
59/2026
Registration Date
25-May-2026
Court
Civil Judge Junior Division Digras
Judge
2-Jt.Civil Judge Jr.Dn. and J.m.f.c., Digras
Last updated 17-Jul-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Ishwar Shankar Rathod
Adv. MOHSIN BAIG SALEEM BAIG
-
2.Rajaram Shankar Rathod
Adv. MOHSIN BAIG SALEEM BAIG
Respondent(s)
-
1.Lata Babusing Pawar
Case History
-
13-Aug-2026
Next hearingPending
-
10-Jul-2026
W.S. and Say
Jt.Civil Judge Jr.Dn. and J.m.f.c., Digras
-
10-Jun-2026
W.S. and Say
Jt.Civil Judge Jr.Dn. and J.m.f.c., Digras
-
29-May-2026
Order on ExhibitView PDF
Case Summary: 59/2026 Order No. 07, dated 29/05/2026 The court granted the petitioners' (Ishwar Shankar Rathod and Rajaram Shankar Rathod) application for an order on "status quo ante" basis. Respondent Lata Babusing Pawar's objections were overruled, with the court finding that Respondent 1 is prepared to restore the subject matter to its previous state and that no loss would be caused to the respondents by granting this relief. The status quo ante order was approved with conditions as specified by the court. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
29-May-2026
W.S. and Say
Jt.Civil Judge Jr.Dn. and J.m.f.c., Digras
-
26-May-2026
Awaiting Summons
Jt.Civil Judge Jr.Dn. and J.m.f.c., Digras
-
25-May-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
25-May-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 59/2026
Case Summary: 59/2026 Order No. 07, dated 29/05/2026 The court granted the petitioners' (Ishwar Shankar Rathod and Rajaram Shankar Rathod) application for an order on "status quo ante" basis. Respondent Lata Babusing Pawar's objections were overruled, with the court finding that Respondent 1 is prepared to restore the subject matter to its previous state and that no loss would be caused to the respondents by granting this relief. The status quo ante order was approved with conditions as specified by the court. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts