The State of Maharashtra vs Idal Bhoju Rathod Advocate - A.M.Pawar — 333/2024
Case under Maharashtra Prohibition Act Section 65,C,D. Disposed: Contested--ACQUITTED on 02nd June 2026.
S.C.C. - Summons/Summary Criminal Case
CNR: MHYA130006072024
Filing Number
495/2024
Filing Date
21-May-2024
Registration No
333/2024
Registration Date
21-May-2024
Court
Civil Judge Junior Division Digras
Judge
1-Civil Judge Jr.Dn. and J.m.f.c., Digras
Decision Date
02-Jun-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ACQUITTED
Last updated 17-Jul-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
222
Police Station
P.S.Digras
Year
2024
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.The State of Maharashtra
Adv. A.P.P.
Respondent(s)
-
1.Idal Bhoju Rathod Advocate - A.M.Pawar
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
02-Jun-2026
Copy of Judgment
Case 333/2024 Summary The court acquitted the accused, Idal Bhoju Rathod, of charges under Maharashtra Prohibition Act Section 65(k) for alleged illegal possession and sale of liquor. The prosecution failed to establish its case because it did not examine the spot panchanama witness, did not produce chemical analysis reports of seized materials, and provided insufficient corroborating evidence beyond the investigating officer's testimony. The court found the prosecution's evidence inadequate to prove the offense beyond reasonable doubt and accordingly ordered the accused's acquittal with bail cancellation and confiscation of seized materials. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
02-Jun-2026
Disposed
Civil Judge Jr.Dn. and J.m.f.c., Digras
-
26-May-2026
Statement U/sec.313 Cr.P.C.
Civil Judge Jr.Dn. and J.m.f.c., Digras
-
06-May-2026
Statement U/sec.313 Cr.P.C.
Civil Judge Jr.Dn. and J.m.f.c., Digras
-
02-May-2026
Statement U/sec.313 Cr.P.C.
Civil Judge Jr.Dn. and J.m.f.c., Digras
-
04-Apr-2026
Statement U/sec.313 Cr.P.C.
Civil Judge Jr.Dn. and J.m.f.c., Digras
-
12-Mar-2026
Evidence Part Heard
Civil Judge Jr.Dn. and J.m.f.c., Digras
-
20-Feb-2026
Evidence Part Heard
Civil Judge Jr.Dn. and J.m.f.c., Digras
-
05-Feb-2026
Evidence Part Heard
Civil Judge Jr.Dn. and J.m.f.c., Digras
-
23-Jan-2026
Evidence Part Heard
Civil Judge Jr.Dn. and J.m.f.c., Digras
-
03-Jan-2026
Evidence Part Heard
Civil Judge Jr.Dn. and J.m.f.c., Digras
-
08-Dec-2025
Evidence Part Heard
Civil Judge Jr.Dn. and J.m.f.c., Digras
-
25-Nov-2025
Evidence Part Heard
Civil Judge Jr.Dn. and J.m.f.c., Digras
-
16-Oct-2025
Evidence
Civil Judge Jr.Dn. and J.m.f.c., Digras
-
30-Jul-2025
Evidence
Civil Judge Jr.Dn. and J.m.f.c., Digras
-
21-Apr-2025
Appearance
Civil Judge Jr.Dn. and J.m.f.c., Digras
-
14-Feb-2025
Appearance
Civil Judge Jr.Dn. and J.m.f.c., Digras
-
22-Oct-2024
Appearance
Civil Judge Jr.Dn. and J.m.f.c., Digras
-
23-Jul-2024
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
21-May-2024
Case filed
Registration No. 333/2024
Case 333/2024 Summary The court acquitted the accused, Idal Bhoju Rathod, of charges under Maharashtra Prohibition Act Section 65(k) for alleged illegal possession and sale of liquor. The prosecution failed to establish its case because it did not examine the spot panchanama witness, did not produce chemical analysis reports of seized materials, and provided insufficient corroborating evidence beyond the investigating officer's testimony. The court found the prosecution's evidence inadequate to prove the offense beyond reasonable doubt and accordingly ordered the accused's acquittal with bail cancellation and confiscation of seized materials. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts