The State of Maharashtra vs Gajanan mahadev Ingle Advocate - V.T.Salve — 123/2024
Case under Maharashtra Prevention of Gambling Act Section 12,a. Disposed: Contested--ACQUITTED on 26th May 2026.
S.C.C. - Summons/Summary Criminal Case
CNR: MHYA130002452024
Filing Number
197/2024
Filing Date
06-Mar-2024
Registration No
123/2024
Registration Date
06-Mar-2024
Court
Civil Judge Junior Division Digras
Judge
1-Civil Judge Jr.Dn. and J.m.f.c., Digras
Decision Date
26-May-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ACQUITTED
Last updated 17-Jul-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
78
Police Station
P.S.Digras
Year
2024
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.The State of Maharashtra
Adv. A.P.P.
Respondent(s)
-
1.Gajanan mahadev Ingle Advocate - V.T.Salve
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
26-May-2026
Copy of JudgmentView PDF
Case Summary: State of Maharashtra v. Gajanan Mahadev Ingle The court acquitted defendant Gajanan Mahadev Ingle of charges under the Maharashtra Gambling Prohibition Act, Section 12-A. The prosecution failed to establish its case, having examined only one witness (a panch/attesting witness) from the seizure panchnama. The court found that the prosecution was unable to prove the scene of offense and seizure details adequately, and closed its evidence without presenting critical testimony from uniformed police officers. The benefit of doubt went to the accused due to insufficient evidence. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
26-May-2026
Disposed
Civil Judge Jr.Dn. and J.m.f.c., Digras
-
04-May-2026
Evidence Part Heard
Civil Judge Jr.Dn. and J.m.f.c., Digras
-
06-Apr-2026
Evidence Part Heard
Civil Judge Jr.Dn. and J.m.f.c., Digras
-
02-Apr-2026
Evidence Part Heard
Civil Judge Jr.Dn. and J.m.f.c., Digras
-
21-Feb-2026
Evidence
Civil Judge Jr.Dn. and J.m.f.c., Digras
-
07-Jan-2026
Evidence
Civil Judge Jr.Dn. and J.m.f.c., Digras
-
09-Oct-2025
Plea / Particulars
Civil Judge Jr.Dn. and J.m.f.c., Digras
-
08-Aug-2025
Plea / Particulars
Civil Judge Jr.Dn. and J.m.f.c., Digras
-
28-May-2025
Appearance
Civil Judge Jr.Dn. and J.m.f.c., Digras
-
16-Jan-2025
Appearance
Civil Judge Jr.Dn. and J.m.f.c., Digras
-
10-Oct-2024
Appearance
Civil Judge Jr.Dn. and J.m.f.c., Digras
-
08-Aug-2024
Appearance
Civil Judge Jr.Dn. and J.m.f.c., Digras
-
30-May-2024
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
06-Mar-2024
Case filed
Registration No. 123/2024
Case Summary: State of Maharashtra v. Gajanan Mahadev Ingle The court acquitted defendant Gajanan Mahadev Ingle of charges under the Maharashtra Gambling Prohibition Act, Section 12-A. The prosecution failed to establish its case, having examined only one witness (a panch/attesting witness) from the seizure panchnama. The court found that the prosecution was unable to prove the scene of offense and seizure details adequately, and closed its evidence without presenting critical testimony from uniformed police officers. The benefit of doubt went to the accused due to insufficient evidence. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts