ALi Raja Abdul Gafar vs State of Maharashtra — 46/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 503. Disposed: Uncontested--ALLOWED / GRANTED AFTER FULL HEARING on 18th June 2026.
Other Misc.Cri.Appln - Other Misc.Criminal Application
CNR: MHYA120005022026
e-Filing Number
25-05-2026
Filing Number
405/2026
Filing Date
26-May-2026
Registration No
46/2026
Registration Date
26-May-2026
Court
Civil Judge Junior Division Mahagaon
Judge
2-Civil Judge Jr.Dn and J.m.f.c., Mahagaon
Decision Date
18-Jun-2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--ALLOWED / GRANTED AFTER FULL HEARING
Last updated 17-Jul-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.ALi Raja Abdul Gafar
Adv. PAREKAR DEVANAND TUKARAM
Respondent(s)
-
1.State of Maharashtra
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
18-Jun-2026
Order on ExhibitView PDF
Case Summary: Ali Raja Abdul Gafar v. State of Maharashtra (O.M.C.A. No. 46/2026) The court allowed the applicant's petition for interim custody of a seized tractor under Section 503 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita. The applicant, the lawful owner, sought release based on agricultural necessity and preventing economic loss from prolonged police custody. The court accepted his ownership documentation and ruled that keeping the vehicle idle at the police station served no purpose and risked deterioration. Interim custody was granted subject to a Rs. 5 lakh security bond, an affidavit promising non-misuse, detailed inspection documentation, color photographs, and prohibition on sale or modification until trial conclusion. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
18-Jun-2026
Disposed
Civil Judge Jr.Dn and J.m.f.c., Mahagaon
-
15-Jun-2026
Reply Unready
Civil Judge Jr.Dn and J.m.f.c., Mahagaon
-
09-Jun-2026
Reply Unready
Civil Judge Jr.Dn and J.m.f.c., Mahagaon
-
26-May-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
26-May-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 46/2026
Case Summary: Ali Raja Abdul Gafar v. State of Maharashtra (O.M.C.A. No. 46/2026) The court allowed the applicant's petition for interim custody of a seized tractor under Section 503 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita. The applicant, the lawful owner, sought release based on agricultural necessity and preventing economic loss from prolonged police custody. The court accepted his ownership documentation and ruled that keeping the vehicle idle at the police station served no purpose and risked deterioration. Interim custody was granted subject to a Rs. 5 lakh security bond, an affidavit promising non-misuse, detailed inspection documentation, color photographs, and prohibition on sale or modification until trial conclusion. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts