Sanjay Ramrao Devsarkar and 7 vs Vilasrao Deorao Devsarkar and — 75/2021
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 111. Status: Evidence. Next hearing: 15th June 2026.
R.C.S. - Regular Civil Suit
CNR: MHYA110019622021
Next Hearing
15th June 2026
Filing Number
127/2021
Filing Date
20-09-2021
Registration No
75/2021
Registration Date
20-09-2021
Court
Civil Judge Junior Division Umarkhed
Judge
3-2nd Joint Civil Judge Jr.Dn. and Judicial Magistrate, F.C., Umarkhed
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Sanjay Ramrao Devsarkar and 7
Adv. Shinde S.T.
Jagdish Ramrao Devsarkar
Sau. Mina Ratan Padole
Sau. Shilpa Shyamsundar Padole
Shrimati Saraswati Wamanrao Devsarkar
Chandrashekhar Wamanrao Devsarkar
Nandkishor Wamanrao Devsarkar
Sau. Varsha Shashikant Pangarkar
Respondent(s)
Vilasrao Deorao Devsarkar and
Dr. Ashok Devrao Devsarkar
Pravain Devrao Devsarkar
Saket Vivek Mamidwar
Bhagwanrao Shamrao Shinde
Hearing History
Judge: 3-2nd Joint Civil Judge Jr.Dn. and Judicial Magistrate, F.C., Umarkhed
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 22-04-2026 | Evidence |
| 12-03-2026 | Evidence |
| 26-02-2026 | Evidence |
| 08-01-2026 | Evidence |
| 18-11-2025 | Evidence |
Interim Orders
Summary The court rejected Defendant No. 1's application for rejection of the plaint with costs. The defendant argued the declaration suit was barred by the 3-year limitation period under Article 58 of the Limitation Act, 1963. However, the court found that the plaintiffs' cause of action arose in 2021 (when the property was demolished and defendants denied their ownership rights), and the suit was filed in 2021, placing it within the limitation period. The court distinguished the cited case law and held the suit was not time-barred. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary The court rejected Defendant No. 1's application for rejection of the plaint with costs. The defendant argued the declaration suit was barred by the 3-year limitation period under Article 58 of the Limitation Act, 1963. However, the court found that the plaintiffs' cause of action arose in 2021 (when the property was demolished and defendants denied their ownership rights), and the suit was filed in 2021, placing it within the limitation period. The court distinguished the cited case law and held the suit was not time-barred. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts