Satva Yadhav Ranmale vs Raju Maroti Sakhare and others — 132/2022

Case under Indian Penal Code Section 294,427,323,452Rw34. Disposed: Uncontested--U/SEC. 258 OF CR.PC on 12th March 2026.

Other Misc.Cri.Appln - Other Misc.Criminal Application

CNR: MHYA110008772022

Case disposed

Filing Number

798/2022

Filing Date

09-05-2022

Registration No

132/2022

Registration Date

09-05-2022

Court

Civil Judge Junior Division Umarkhed

Judge

3-2nd Joint Civil Judge Jr.Dn. and Judicial Magistrate, F.C., Umarkhed

Decision Date

12th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--U/SEC. 258 OF CR.PC

Acts & Sections

Indian Penal Code Section 294,427,323,452Rw34
Code of Criminal Procedure Section 156

Petitioner(s)

Satva Yadhav Ranmale

Adv. Naik S.B.

Respondent(s)

Raju Maroti Sakhare and others

Hearing History

Judge: 3-2nd Joint Civil Judge Jr.Dn. and Judicial Magistrate, F.C., Umarkhed

12-03-2026

Disposed

05-03-2026

Dismissal Order

11-12-2025

Dismissal Order

29-09-2025

Dismissal Order

01-08-2025

Dismissal Order

Final Orders / Judgements

12-03-2026
Copy of Judgment

The Judicial Magistrate dismissed the criminal complaint filed by Satva Ranmale against Raju Sakhre and others for offenses under IPC sections 294, 427, 452, 323 r/w 34, due to want of prosecution. The court found that the complainant and his advocate had remained absent for an extended period since the complaint's filing in 2022 and failed to take effective steps despite multiple opportunities, indicating lack of interest in proceeding with the case. Consequently, the accused was acquitted of all charges. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

The Judicial Magistrate dismissed the criminal complaint filed by Satva Ranmale against Raju Sakhre and others for offenses under IPC sections 294, 427, 452, 323 r/w 34, due to want of prosecution. The court found that the complainant and his advocate had remained absent for an extended period since the complaint's filing in 2022 and failed to take effective steps despite multiple opportunities, indicating lack of interest in proceeding with the case. Consequently, the accused was acquitted of all charges. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

Civil Judge Junior Division Umarkhed All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case