Kamal Dattarao Hake vs None — 13/2026

Case under Bombay Regulation Act,1827. Disposed: Uncontested--ALLOWED / GRANTED AFTER FULL HEARING on 02nd April 2026.

Civil M.A. - Civil Misc. Application

CNR: MHYA110001682026

Case disposed

e-Filing Number

27-01-2026

Filing Number

31/2026

Filing Date

27-01-2026

Registration No

13/2026

Registration Date

28-01-2026

Court

Civil Judge Junior Division Umarkhed

Judge

3-2nd Joint Civil Judge Jr.Dn. and Judicial Magistrate, F.C., Umarkhed

Decision Date

02nd April 2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--ALLOWED / GRANTED AFTER FULL HEARING

Acts & Sections

Bombay Regulation Act,1827

Petitioner(s)

Kamal Dattarao Hake

Adv. Nagorao Dattatray Chandle

Chayabai Kisan Khunnar

Adv. Nagorao Dattatray Chandle

Datta Tukaram Haral

Adv. Nagorao Dattatray Chandle

Digambar Tukaram Haral

Adv. Nagorao Dattatray Chandle

Respondent(s)

None

Hearing History

Judge: 3-2nd Joint Civil Judge Jr.Dn. and Judicial Magistrate, F.C., Umarkhed

02-04-2026

Disposed

27-03-2026

Arguments

12-03-2026

Arguments

29-01-2026

Proclomation

Final Orders / Judgements

02-04-2026
Copy of Judgment

Summary The court granted the petition and issued a heirship certificate recognizing the four applicants (two daughters and two sons) as the sole legal heirs of the deceased Chhayabai Tukaram Harale, who died on 04.09.2025 in Amddapur, Umrkhed, Yavatmal district. The court found the applicants had established their heirship through death certificate, affidavits, and witness testimony, with no other claimants appearing despite public notice. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The court granted the petition and issued a heirship certificate recognizing the four applicants (two daughters and two sons) as the sole legal heirs of the deceased Chhayabai Tukaram Harale, who died on 04.09.2025 in Amddapur, Umrkhed, Yavatmal district. The court found the applicants had established their heirship through death certificate, affidavits, and witness testimony, with no other claimants appearing despite public notice. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

Civil Judge Junior Division Umarkhed All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case